Mallard Fillmore

Expect plenty of disagreement. Just keep it civil.
Post Reply
Bennett Cerf
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Sat Sep 16, 2006 12:15 pm

Image
Top
Bennett Cerf
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Mon Sep 18, 2006 10:18 am

Image
Top
User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:
Contact Rspaight

Postby Rspaight » Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:13 am

There's so much wrong with this I can't figure out how to respond.

Response 1:

Hey! Remember when the media admitted that they were irresponsible and hasty in doing thousands of gleeful stories about Clinton bombing al Qaeda to distract attention from his blowjob, when bin Laden was really a legitimate threat?

Oh yeah, neither do I.

Response 2:

Last I checked, the State Department was part of the executive branch.

Response 3:

So, Karl Rove telling reporters that Plame was "fair game" was irrelevant since Armitage (Deputy SecState = "some guy") also revealed the info?

In the final analysis, I'll just chalk it up to Tinsley's deranged multi-colored-duck-infested imagination.

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney
Top
User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4592
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:
Contact lukpac

Postby lukpac » Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:24 am

Rspaight wrote:Last I checked, the State Department was part of the executive branch.


There you go, splitting straws again.
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD
Top
Bennett Cerf
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:51 am

It's a fact. One of the Bush appointees in the executive branch who blabbed about Plame did not work at the White House.

Case closed.
Top
Bennett Cerf
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:20 am

Image

Is that supposed to be Ahmadinejad?
Top
User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:
Contact Rspaight

Postby Rspaight » Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:31 am

It looks like Abe Lincoln.

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney
Top
Bennett Cerf
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:32 am

Image
Top
User avatar
krabapple
Posts: 1615
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 4:19 pm

Postby krabapple » Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:37 am

It would be more honest if Tinsley simply drew every one of his 'liberals' like this:

Image
"I recommend that you delete the Rancid Snakepit" - Grant
Top
Bennett Cerf
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:32 am

Image
Top
User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4592
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:
Contact lukpac

Postby lukpac » Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:08 am

Bennett Cerf wrote:Image


Was the duck surprised about CBS and Reagan?
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD
Top
Bennett Cerf
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:23 am

I want to know why he loses the hat in the second panel.
Top
User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:
Contact Rspaight

Postby Rspaight » Tue Sep 26, 2006 11:18 am

Ducks says: "changed the 9/11 program to make the Clinton administration look better"

Reality: "changed wholly fictionalized scenes that advanced right-wing talking points and contradicted the actual record"

But we always knew the duck wasn't reality-based.

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney
Top
User avatar
CitizenDan
Posts: 396
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:26 am
Location: Capitol City, Minn.

Postby CitizenDan » Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:38 am

Bennett Cerf wrote:I want to know why he loses the hat in the second panel.


Tinsley didn't get where he is today without being a master of the Copy + Paste functions on his PC.
We were right about Vietnam. We were right about Nixon. We were right about Reaganomics. Trust us -- we're right about Bush, too.
Top
Bennett Cerf
Posts: 739
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:54 am

Image

This strip is bizarre even for Tinsley.

First, he sees Democrats as "drunk with power" over something that was at best a partial victory.

Second, he apparently believes the ultimate compliment for one of the Democrats' most prominent women is to call her "da man."

As for Charlie Gibson in a tutu, maybe Tinsley should have kept that fantasy to himself.

(And that's two gender-bending nonsequiturs in one strip!)
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Politics”