While I was watching the convention tonight (more on this later), CNN decided it was more important to listen to the trenchant insights of its talking heads (Blitzer, Woodruff and Greenfield) than whatever was going on at the convention that they were supposedly covering.
Apparently, Kerry was at Kennedy Space Center today and got the VIP tour. At one point, he visited some sort of clean-room environment and so had to put on clean-room gear.
Well, Drudge, among other like-minded Netizens, decided that pictures of this were somehow damaging to Kerry and posted them with mocking captions. (one's still on Drudge's homepage as I type this if you're curious). Yeah, he looked a little goofy, but anyone does in a clean-room suit. Par for the course, nothing to see here.
So, this somehow becomes news to the CNN hairdos, and they say that Kerry put on "some sort of space suit" to "protect him from the elements" like he was playing astronaut or something (they had no clue what he was obviously wearing) and then rolled the tape of Dukakis in the tank with the big goofy helmet from '88, implying that this was a similar incident that would make Kerry look dumb and cost him the election.
I love our biased liberal media.
Ryan
CNN Anchors are Morons
-
Rspaight
- Posts: 4386
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
- Location: The Reality-Based Community
- Contact:
CNN Anchors are Morons
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney
-
lukpac
- Top Dog and Sellout
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
Re: CNN Anchors are Morons
Rspaight wrote:While I was watching the convention tonight (more on this later), CNN decided it was more important to listen to the trenchant insights of its talking heads (Blitzer, Woodruff and Greenfield) than whatever was going on at the convention that they were supposedly covering.
You're sure you don't work for the AP?
Too many pundits, not enough convention?
Networks, critics have differing views on coverage
NEW YORK (AP) -- Some TV viewers might not be aware that former President Carter, Al Gore and Al Sharpton all spoke at last week's Democratic convention.
They certainly heard from Bill O'Reilly, Wolf Blitzer and Chris Matthews, though.
It was a pundits convention for the cable news channels, which were on the air many more hours than the big broadcasters. To some, CNN, Fox News Channel and MSNBC provided a necessary filter for a staged event. Others believe they simply talked too much amongst themselves.
Asked about TV coverage of the convention, Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry told USA Today: "The talking heads keep talking, and you can't hear anything."
"The notion that the (broadcast) networks have offered that they don't have to cover the convention because you can watch it on cable is actually not true," said Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism, a media research group. "If you want to watch the convention, you have to watch PBS, C-SPAN or ABC's digital channel."
The people on the podium were least visible on Fox News Channel.
While CNN and MSNBC carried Gore's 15-minute speech in its entirety, Fox looked in for one minute. CNN and MSNBC listened to Carter for 16 minutes, while Fox telecast five minutes live, somewhere in the middle of his speech.
Fox had about five minutes of Sen. Edward Kennedy's nearly half-hour speech live on the air and three minutes of Sharpton's, while the others carried most or all of them.
During the beginning of Sharpton's speech, Fox carried a taped O'Reilly interview with ABC's Peter Jennings. After providing a taste of Sharpton, O'Reilly cut away to talk to two print journalists about his own interview with filmmaker Michael Moore the previous night.
'It really doesn't matter at this point'
On the convention's first night, the camera trained on O'Reilly in Fox's FleetCenter skybooth while Maryland Sen. Barbara Mikulski spoke behind him to the convention. (None of the networks carried her speech.)
"Somebody's out there screaming about something," O'Reilly said. "I don't know what it is and it really doesn't matter at this point."
After some critics questioned Fox's short attention span for Gore and Carter, O'Reilly -- ringleader of the "no spin zone" -- explained the next night that his mission was to provide viewers with perspective rather than propaganda.
In other words: they decide, they report.
"The newspaper pinheads claim because we aren't broadcasting the speeches we're not fair," he said. "That, of course, (is) a bunch of baloney."
It's a defiant stance for a cable channel in the cross-hairs of liberal political groups this summer and the subject of a documentary, "Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism," that claims Fox shows a pattern of support for the Republican agenda.
But with conventions nothing more than extended political commercials, Fox's news judgment is a necessary service, said Brent Bozell, founder of the conservative media watchdog, the Media Research Center. He said he hopes the network does the same at the GOP convention.
"I have no problem with any network saying, 'We're not going to focus on the fluff that they give us. We're going to analyze this,' " Bozell said.
While not editing as tightly as Fox, CNN and MSNBC both spent more time showing its personalities talking to each other than sending reporters out to interview delegates or see what, if anything, was happening behind the scenes.
CNN's Larry King spent each night with analysts familiar to any regular watcher of his nightly talk show -- Bob Woodward, Bob Dole and George Mitchell. Similarly, Matthews moderated an MSNBC panel with Willie Brown, Joe Scarborough, Andrea Mitchell and Howard Fineman.
'There is still news going on'
The notion that conventions are nothing more than infomercials is wrong, Rosenstiel said.
"They are staged events," he said. "There's not really a sense that something unexpected is going to happen. But there is still news going on. The conventions are still events where the public will change their minds."
The convention was the first chance most Americans had to see Kerry present his case for an extended period, he said. All of the networks -- including ABC, CBS and NBC -- carried Kerry's speech in full.
"In this age of 30-second commercials and eight-second sound bites, that's very significant," Rosenstiel said.
The cable news networks seemed to use the convention as a backdrop to promote their regular prime-time programming, rather than covering it, he said; and in prime time, these are all-talk networks instead of news networks.
Given spotlight roles were King and Matthews, who have the highest-rated prime-time shows on their particular networks.
Except for Thursday on Fox, the news anchor Brit Hume was kept to 10 p.m. EDT while the regular opinionated talk show hosts -- O'Reilly, Sean Hannity and Alan Colmes, who typically lead Fox to ratings victories in prime time -- kept their perches.
There were some signs of doubt among the cable news channels Thursday; all gave considerable attention to the convention speakers warming up for Kerry.
Oddly, the strategy undermines critics who argue that ABC, CBS and NBC shirked their duty by televising only three hours of convention coverage. If this is what they're showing, who needs more?
And all the networks will likely defend themselves with ratings. The broadcast ratings were down, so network executives can point to that as proof they didn't underestimate the public's interest. Cable ratings were way up, which cable-news executives will use to indicate they're doing something right.
"Who's responsible, then, for letting the public see this?" Rosenstiel asked. "Is no one responsible? PBS does it because they think it's the right thing to do journalistically. C-SPAN is doing it because it's what they do -- they train cameras on events.
"None of the people who have access to our homes over the public airwaves feel an obligation to allow us to see the convention."
Copyright 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD
-
TSmithPage
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2003 9:20 pm
- Contact:
My thought exactly, Ryan. It's perfectly OK for Fox to handle the convention this way, as long as they don't give greater deference to the speakers at the GOP convention. Of course, what are the odds that both conventions will be handled the same way. More likely, they'll play all the speakers at the GOP convention, and defend themselves by claiming they were reacting to criticism of their handling of the Democratic convention.