Medicare report/rolling back timber rules

Expect plenty of disagreement. Just keep it civil.
User avatar
MK
Posts: 946
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:24 pm
Location: North America

Medicare report/rolling back timber rules

Postby MK » Wed Mar 24, 2004 12:11 pm

Checking out the papers today, the big news is the 9/11 panel accusing both the Clinton and Bush administrations of failing to prevent 9/11 when they may have had a good shot at it, but checking out the front page of the Chicago Tribune, there's some other big news that has been overlooked.

A report's been issued that predicts Medicare will become insolvent in 15 years, a report that takes into consideration the big Medicare bill the GOP passed last year, the same one that's supposed to be touted as a big aid to Medicare (which apparently is more like putting a band-aid on an Ebola infection).

Meanwhile over at CNN:

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/03/ ... index.html

That's right, the administrations rolled back some timber regulations thanks to a lawsuit by the timber industry crying about how those same regulations would have been intrusive, requiring more work and a few extra years to complete. So, now they don't have to check for endangered plants or animals when logging a good chunk of old growth forests up in the Pacific Northwest.

At this point, if an inanimate carbon rod was on the ballot, it would get my vote over the incumbents.

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Wed Mar 24, 2004 12:23 pm

A report's been issued that predicts Medicare will become insolvent in 15 years, a report that takes into consideration the big Medicare bill the GOP passed last year, the same one that's supposed to be touted as a big aid to Medicare (which apparently is more like putting a band-aid on an Ebola infection).


You mean the bill that the administration refused to reveal the true cost of, instead floating a figure they knew to be $150 billion too low, and threatened to fire the head Medicare actuary if he (pardon the pun) spilled the beans?

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/18/polit ... &position=

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

Ron
Posts: 489
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 4:11 am
Location: Far Away From All You Fellas

Re: Medicare report/rolling back timber rules

Postby Ron » Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:01 pm

MK wrote:At this point, if an inanimate carbon rod was on the ballot, it would get my vote over the incumbents.


rspaight wrote:To be honest, if the Dems nominated a 4x8 sheet of plywood, I'd vote plywood.


This shapes up as quite a race.
Dr. Ron :mrgreen:TM "Do it 'till you're sick of it. Do it 'till you can't do it no more." Jesse Winchester

User avatar
Patrick M
Posts: 1714
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: LukPac Land

Postby Patrick M » Wed Mar 24, 2004 7:05 pm

Burns wrote:And remember, a shiny new donkey for whoever brings me the head of Colonel Montoya.

Matt
Posts: 539
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 11:24 pm
What color are leaves?: Green
Spam?: No
Location: People's Republic of Maryland

Re: Medicare report/rolling back timber rules

Postby Matt » Thu Mar 25, 2004 9:05 am

Ron wrote:
MK wrote:At this point, if an inanimate carbon rod was on the ballot, it would get my vote over the incumbents.


rspaight wrote:To be honest, if the Dems nominated a 4x8 sheet of plywood, I'd vote plywood.


This shapes up as quite a race.


:lol:
-Matt