Regarding the Shiavo matter

Expect plenty of disagreement. Just keep it civil.
Dob
Posts: 903
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 2:14 pm
Location: Detroit

Postby Dob » Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:52 pm

Rob P wrote:...if they really wanted to honor God's will, wouldn't they advocate taking her OFF the life support? Isn't making her remain on life support using the will of man to trump God's will?

In order to answer those questions, we must presume to know what God's will actually is. What if God doesn't want either one of those things? What if God didn't want her to get sick in the first place? If a drunk driver had killed her in a hit and run, would that have been God's will? If every action of man is (directly or indirectly) God's will, then removing the feeding tube would be God's will as well.

But without getting into a deep philosophical discussion, I think most people would agree that the ideal outcome would be a miraculous recovery. Some might say that we should keep her alive in order to hold the door open for such a miracle ("through God all things are possible"), but I believe that "To every thing there is a season...a time to be born, and a time to die."

What's really ridiculous, IMO, is calling the removal of the feeding tube "murder." Let's suppose that Terri ended up this way as a result of being shot. So the person that removes the feeding tube is the murderer...not the person who pulled the trigger? Or are they both "equally guilty" of murder?
Dob
-------------------
"Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance" -- HL Mencken

User avatar
dudelsack
Posts: 351
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:51 pm

Postby dudelsack » Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:59 pm

Rspaight wrote:
I heard on the radio this afternoon that the Vatican has weighed in on this question. According to them, the feeding tube is not a form of extraordinary "life support" but instead just the way Terri happens to eat. *Removing it* would, in their eyes, be "playing God" and deciding who lives and dies, not leaving it connected.


It's not like the Vatican cares if she's brain dead...the power to think has never been a requirement of Catholicism.


(too easy, yes)

User avatar
Rob P
Posts: 407
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 8:06 am
Location: Godforsakenland

Postby Rob P » Tue Mar 22, 2005 7:37 am

Dob wrote:In order to answer those questions, we must presume to know what God's will actually is. What if God doesn't want either one of those things? What if God didn't want her to get sick in the first place? If a drunk driver had killed her in a hit and run, would that have been God's will? If every action of man is (directly or indirectly) God's will, then removing the feeding tube would be God's will as well.

But without getting into a deep philosophical discussion, I think most people would agree that the ideal outcome would be a miraculous recovery. Some might say that we should keep her alive in order to hold the door open for such a miracle ("through God all things are possible"), but I believe that "To every thing there is a season...a time to be born, and a time to die."


I didn't want to get too philosophical either, because I don't think anyone knows what God's will is, except in their own mind. To me, the will of man, and science, is keeping her alive at this point, not God's will (if one chooses to believe in God).

The Schiavo family is waiting for a miracle, partially because they are strict Roman Catholics, and partially because they have an emotional attachment that I could never fully understand unless I went through the same ordeal with a family member. However, there's the husband, who is with all judicial precedents the one to make this kind of decision, and the will of the courts, who have consistently supported the right of the husband. The husband is no saint, which brings his motives into question. But, he's right when it comes to her not wanting to stay alive in that kind of state. Who among us would? In a hypothetical poll, I can't imagine a lot of people answering affirmatively that they would want to remain alive in a persistent vegetative state, with their cerebral cortex liquified.

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4592
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Re: Regarding the Shiavo matter

Postby lukpac » Tue Mar 22, 2005 9:50 am

krabapple wrote:The whole politicizaiton of the right-to-die thing is mess enough, but something is REALLY bugging me: can someone please explain how the hell the family gets 'SHY-voh' from 'Schiavo'?


Why not? I suppose it could be 'shy-ah-voh'. But I guess the 'a' is silent.

Where I come from if you pronounced 'Schiavo' any way other than 'SkeeAHvo' or 'SheeAHvo', people would think you're retarded.


You know people with that last name?
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

User avatar
krabapple
Posts: 1615
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 4:19 pm

Re: Regarding the Shiavo matter

Postby krabapple » Tue Mar 22, 2005 11:27 am

lukpac wrote:
krabapple wrote:The whole politicizaiton of the right-to-die thing is mess enough, but something is REALLY bugging me: can someone please explain how the hell the family gets 'SHY-voh' from 'Schiavo'?


Why not? I suppose it could be 'shy-ah-voh'. But I guess the 'a' is silent.


er....maybe in Wisconsin. Or anywhere else where they think Domino's is pizza.

Where I come from if you pronounced 'Schiavo' any way other than 'SkeeAHvo' or 'SheeAHvo', people would think you're retarded.


You know people with that last name?


Sure. I grew up in the Bronx and all my buddies were Italian and Irish. I also knew a "Schiaza". Which I assure wasn't pronounced 'Shyza" . Ever.
"I recommend that you delete the Rancid Snakepit" - Grant

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4592
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Tue Mar 22, 2005 11:29 am

How can you argue with how someone pronounces/spells their *own* name?
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

Dob
Posts: 903
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 2:14 pm
Location: Detroit

Postby Dob » Tue Mar 22, 2005 12:07 pm

Folks with strong ties to their heritage sometimes bristle at others from the same heritage who "americanize" the pronunciation of their names. Of course, it's none of their business, but there it is.

My favorite case of mispronunciation was on the show Absolutely Fabulous, where the surname Bucket was pronounced "bouquet" in an attempt to give it some class.
Dob

-------------------

"Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance" -- HL Mencken

User avatar
CitizenDan
Posts: 396
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 11:26 am
Location: Capitol City, Minn.

Postby CitizenDan » Tue Mar 22, 2005 12:15 pm

I knew a girl in college whose family did just the opposite: The family name was Bigot (pronounced Bee-JOH), but they didn't want to sound all highfalutin so they pronounced it like the word bigot. Weird.
We were right about Vietnam. We were right about Nixon. We were right about Reaganomics. Trust us -- we're right about Bush, too.

User avatar
krabapple
Posts: 1615
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 4:19 pm

Postby krabapple » Tue Mar 22, 2005 12:26 pm

lukpac wrote:How can you argue with how someone pronounces/spells their *own* name?



On matters this important, I can argue easily and often.
"I recommend that you delete the Rancid Snakepit" - Grant

User avatar
balthazar
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 11:01 am
Location: Stoughton, WI, USA
Contact:

Postby balthazar » Tue Mar 22, 2005 12:32 pm

How can you argue with how someone pronounces/spells their *own* name?


It's pretty easy to argue when their pronunciation goes against the rules of whatever language the name comes from.

My wife's dentist's last name is Theis. Forgiving that there's only one "s" I want to pronounce it so it rhymes with "ice." The poor bugger rhymes it with "fleece."
"It's great how you can control 60 musicians with one just stick-- I can't control these fuckers with two!" -- Ian Paice

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Tue Mar 22, 2005 12:36 pm

I will defend to the death my right to make fun of Versailles, KY being pronounced Ver-SALES.

Even I'm not pedantic enough to complain about our Paris pronounced PAIR-us, but I will, however, note with derision our Athens, pronounced AY-thens.

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

Ess Ay Cee Dee
Posts: 1458
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:35 pm
Contact:

Postby Ess Ay Cee Dee » Tue Mar 22, 2005 12:49 pm

My favorite is Cairo, Illinois. The locals pronounce it KAY-ro. :roll:

User avatar
balthazar
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 11:01 am
Location: Stoughton, WI, USA
Contact:

Postby balthazar » Tue Mar 22, 2005 3:15 pm

My favorite is Cairo, Illinois. The locals pronounce it KAY-ro.


Must be the same people down there who "warsh" their clothes.

Must be to get all the corn syrup out of them.
"It's great how you can control 60 musicians with one just stick-- I can't control these fuckers with two!" -- Ian Paice

User avatar
dudelsack
Posts: 351
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:51 pm

Postby dudelsack » Tue Mar 22, 2005 3:41 pm

balthazar wrote:.

Must be to get all the corn syrup out of them.


Is that SUR-up or SEER-up? Inquiring minds want to know.

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:05 pm

Back home, we warshed all our clothes in the crick.

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney