After his appearance in New Hampshire, Graham issued a statement saying he was not calling for Bush's impeachment and saw the issue as a largely academic one, adding that if Bush had misled the American public he would pay the price for it in the 2004 presidential election.
If it's merely an "academic" question, and if Bush will "pay the price" in the 2004 election, then I agree with you Mikey--why even bring up impeachment? HAVE THESE MEN NO BALLS? I mean, maybe Bush went to war for the wrong reasons, but at least he's got the balls to go to war--something I doubt any of these pussy Democrats could do.