Mallard Fillmore

Expect plenty of disagreement. Just keep it civil.
Bennett Cerf
Posts: 738
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Wed Jan 10, 2007 1:32 am

Mallard Fillmore Makes Me Sad

Someone once said, about reading the old comic strip "Nancy," that so little happened in it, it actually took longer to ignore. It takes a few seconds to ignore the comic strip "Mallard Fillmore," but it's worth the time.

If you don't read the funnies - and why don't you? - you should know that "Mallard Fillmore" is a reactionary comic 400 newspapers run for political balance, to make up for the strips by amusing people who can draw. There's no other explanation, except as a sick joke on affirmative action, like putting Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court, or making Carrie queen of the prom.

Mallard Fillmore is a duck (get it?) who dares to speak out against the liberal elites, women's libbers, teachers unions, and political correctness in all its forms. And if those targets sound as fresh as the day they were made - 1980 - they are. Any minute now Mallard will take on Preppies, and after that Valley Girls had better watch out.

Mallard also thinks his taxes are too high, wonders why kids can't pray in school and notes - with a jaundiced eye - that Bill Clinton got half a blow job in 1995.

If you think we've lost the true meaning of Veterans Day and there's a war on Christmas, this is the comic for you. Also, if "Momma" is too challenging and "Cathy" in the changing room makes you uncomfortably hot, down there.

Why is this comic strip in my newspaper? I know we feel like we're helping Republicans, when we pretend they're as smart as regular people, but it's patronizing, and it only hurts them in the long run.

And yes, there are some lousy liberal comics too. There's not enough guilt in the world to make the average non-Hispanic read "La Cucaracha" and "Tom Tomorrow" is just embarrassing. But "Mallard Fillmore" is an actual disgrace. Reading it is like watching the loneliest creep at the gun show try to pick up a waitress by quoting George Will, throw up on himself, and cry.

Another of Mallard's favorite targets is Ted Kennedy -- Can you imagine, Ted Kennedy challenging John Roberts about the law! This is the same man who had a car accident in 1969! -- so you wouldn't really be human at all if you didn't feel the warm glow of schadenfreude when Bruce Tinsley - Mallard's creator - got arrested for drunk driving last month.

Here's his mug shot.

Image

Come on waitress... just tell me your name... I'll show you my Lugar... BLEUCCHHHHHH! Oh no! My "tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants" t-shirt... I got vomit all over it... I wish I had a bullet that fit...?
Where was I?

It was Tinsley's second arrest in six months. Which would suggest he has problems beyond loneliness and not being funny. But what was really inspiring was that he picked himself up, dusted himself off, used some paper towels to blot the puke, and composed the strip that appeared yesterday.

(I wish King Features would post it, but they don't. Take my word for it, it reads:)

MORE OUT ON A LIMB! ... MALLARD'S 2007 NEW-YEAR'S PREDICTIONS: HOLLYWOOD WILL CONTINUE TO MOCK "FAMILY VALUES"... MEANWHILE, RESEARCHERS WILL FINALLY DISCOVER A CELEBRITY'S KID WHO ISN'T MESSED UP AND IN REHAB...

The text is accompanied by a drawing of a long-nosed man, presumably a movie producer, laughing, presumably at Jesus on the cross. You can tell he's a movie producer, because he has a ponytail. And it's 1975.

In Indiana, where Tinsley was arrested, driving with a blood alcohol level of .08 is a class C misdemeanor. Tinsley's blood alcohol was 0.14. Which means Tinsley will pay a fine, have his license suspended and, "may be placed on probation and be required to enroll in, and pay for, a substance abuse education course."

Is that different than being "messed up and in rehab"? I don't know. I only commute to Hollywood. And I do my drinking at home, where the kids can watch.

Bennett Cerf
Posts: 738
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Wed Jan 10, 2007 10:15 am

Image

User avatar
krabapple
Posts: 1615
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 4:19 pm

Postby krabapple » Thu Jan 11, 2007 1:22 am

Kelly calling a Luger a 'Lugar' and dissing Tom Tomorrow's strip makes me sad.
"I recommend that you delete the Rancid Snakepit" - Grant

Bennett Cerf
Posts: 738
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:47 am

Image

Bennett Cerf
Posts: 738
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Fri Jan 12, 2007 10:48 am

Image

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:05 pm

I wonder how the duck figures that the network viewers are going to Fox. The duck's own source says Fox numbers are going down and MSNBC is going up:

http://journalism.org/node/3234

It's no shock that network is declining compared to cable. But the duck seems to think that Fox is the only cable net.

Silly duck.

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

Bennett Cerf
Posts: 738
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:29 pm

I have no idea which article on journalism.org is supposed to be his source.

When's he going to cite Google.com as his source?

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Sat Jan 13, 2007 9:39 am

Source: THE INTERNET

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

Bennett Cerf
Posts: 738
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Sat Jan 13, 2007 4:09 pm

Image

Bennett Cerf
Posts: 738
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Sun Jan 14, 2007 2:29 pm

Image

A joke about O.J. Simpson's "If I Did It"? Really?

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Sun Jan 14, 2007 3:47 pm

I guess he didn't get the memo.

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

Bennett Cerf
Posts: 738
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:03 pm

Image

User avatar
Jeff
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 5:54 pm

Postby Jeff » Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:06 pm

Har-dee-har-har.

I think the Iraqis would feel a little more secure if it were Shrub's face on that tombstone.

Bennett Cerf
Posts: 738
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:01 am

Image

Bennett Cerf
Posts: 738
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Fri Jan 19, 2007 11:04 am

Image

Duck and Cover analysis:

Today's panel leaves us with two equally-disturbing possible interpretations:

1. Mallard does not realize these e-mails are from con artists and actually believes he has a solution to African poverty.

2. Mallard thinks it is funny to mock African poverty and Bono's attempts to eradicate it. As if that were not enough, he juxtaposes extreme poverty against his inconvenience at having to delete bogus email, as if the two are somehow equivalent in stature.

On the plus side, no poetry!