Forums dot

A place to discuss music and Mallard Fillmore
It is currently Sat Feb 17, 2018 6:16 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: DSLRs
PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 2:47 pm 
Top Dog and Sellout
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: Madison, WI
A few weeks ago I sucked it up and finally entered the world of digital (not counting a 2MP Kodak P&S). I got a Nikon D200, mainly because I can use all of my existing lenses, even my manual focus ones (MF lenses are pretty much useless with the lower end DSLRs).

I had looked at Nikon's DSLRs for a while, but I never bit, due to both the MF lens issue and the "DX" sensor size (more on that below). With the D200 the lens issue is gone (of course, it wasn't a problem with the higher end models either, but those were *significantly* more than I wanted to spend), and I basically gave up holding out for a full 35mm sensor from Nikon.

Anyway, so far I'm pretty happy with it. I've taken quite a few pictures at ISO 1600, and noise is really minimal - maybe on the order of grain with ISO 400 film or so (although I haven't done a direct comparison). I really haven't even begun to check out all of the options - I've pretty much stuck with basic stuff so far.

While it hasn't been a huge deal, I'm still not thrilled with the DX sensor "crop factor". I've often seen it called a "zoom factor", but that isn't what it is. You get exactly the same image you do with a full 35mm frame, except that it's cropped. Depth of field and perspective don't change. So, for example, if you use a 50mm lens with a DX sensor, you'll get the same "real life" perspective you would with a 35mm camera, but you'll get a smaller angle of view. It doesn't bug me that much most of the time, but for wider angle shots you really get a hyper wide angle perspective (big depth of field, large perceived distances from near to far, etc). I suppose it's just a matter of being used to what 35mm gives.

I still have some reservations about digital in general. With film, the same camera can take advantage of advances in film - you can get *exactly* the same image using a 50 year old SLR as you can with a brand new SLR. With digital, you need to buy a new camera when the technology changes. At this point, reservations be damned I suppose.

Whatever the case, it's been fun so far.

"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group