Half-Life 2

Computers, gadgets, etc. Music/audio-related discussions should be posted in Audio Technology.
User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Half-Life 2

Postby Rspaight » Sun Nov 28, 2004 6:47 pm

Don't know if anybody cares about this, but I finished it a couple of nights ago and had a great time doing so.

I'm not a huge gamer, but the original Half-Life was strongly recommended to me. It won me over when, after an experiment gone horribly wrong, I rescued a gray-haired scientist from a slavering green creature shooting energy bolts. The scientist looked me in the eye and said, "Well, there goes our grant money."

HL2 isn't innovative in any real way (save one, which I'll get to) but while it doesn't astonish with its intelligence the way HL did, it impresses with its sheer technical wizardry. I realized this as I attempted to navigate a system of canals in a mini-speedboat, while the bad guys sniped me from the shore, threw burning barrels of toxic waste at me, pushed a wrecked car off a bridge in my path, lit a firewall which I had to jump over, and finally brought a twenty-story high smokestack down on me. Yee-hah!

But while the technology on display is over-the-top, the game itself isn't. The pacing is good, with knockout moments like the one above tempered by quieter puzzles and character moments. (The human models are jaw-dropping, and the voice acting quite good.) Instead of the huge pile of redundant weapons many FPS games load you down with (eight different machine guns, four different types of grenades, etc.), here you stick with the basics -- the iconic crowbar, a couple of pistols, shotgun, machine gun, grenades, a rocket launcher.

And then there's the innovation -- the gravity gun. This sucker is a hoot. While through most of the game it's not much of a weapon in and of itself, you can wreak a whole lot of havoc with it. In one mode, you can simply blast objects (up to and including wrecked trucks) out of your way. In the other, you can suck any object to you, then either hold it, drop it, or fling it away. Held down by sniper fire? Use the gravity gun to rip a radiator out of the wall and use it as a shield. Crate of ammo just out of reach? Just draw it to you. Big bunch of bad guys show up? Grab an explosive barrel and throw it at them. You can even grab a grenade that's thrown at you and hurl it back at the attacker. Great fun.

Throw all this together with a serviceable plot and couple of killer vehicle segments and you've got a heckuva game. While Doom 3 was ultimately just level after level of things jumping out of the dark at you, this progresses smartly and keeps your interest. And it's nice to play a game that doesn't resort to throwing impossible-to-beat "bosses" at you.

Complaints? The end, while thankfully not the impossible feat of timing and luck that the first HL featured, is a bit on the easy side. The battles with the Combine soldiers somehow aren't as much white-knuckle fun as the Marine battles in the original -- the Combine guys don't seem as smart and quick. When late in the game you get to lead troops into battle, your comrades seem to get in your way as much as help. Oh, yeah, and the load times are watching-paint-dry slow.

But if you're into FPS games at all, this one is well worth checking out.

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4591
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Sun Nov 28, 2004 7:37 pm

Since the original Quake (multiplayer), I really haven't been in to games much. I really liked Unreal Tournament, but at the time we never had the network of players and servers that we did with Quake (dorm room networks were a dream in '97).

I thought Q2 pretty much sucked, and Q3 was decent, but it never held my interest that much. Since then I haven't even tuned in.
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:04 pm

Since I'm a misanthrope, I never got into multiplayer network games.

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4591
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:34 pm

Crap, network puts single player to shame.

IMHO of course.
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

User avatar
Xenu
Sellout
Posts: 2209
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 8:15 pm

Postby Xenu » Tue Dec 21, 2004 6:03 pm

I enjoyed HL2, but felt that (barring fun things like the gravity gun) there was actually less variety that in the original game. Instead of many minor areas of diverse setting, we get several huge major areas where nothing much tends to change. There seemed to be less variety in the beastiary, as well, and the AI was something of a let-down.

But I enjoyed it. "Best game of all time?" Certainly not.
-------------
"Fuckin' Koreans" - Reno 911

Matt
Posts: 539
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 11:24 pm
What color are leaves?: Green
Spam?: No
Location: People's Republic of Maryland

Postby Matt » Tue Dec 21, 2004 10:51 pm

I am glad the network play add-on was released recently. I find HL2 network play enjoyable, even though the quantity of online maps is lacking now.
-Matt