Page 1 of 2

U.S. hostage screams in horror as he is beheaded.

Posted: Wed May 12, 2004 10:49 am
by Matt
This disgusts and saddens me to no end.

http://www.nypost.com/news/worldnews/20688.htm

U.S. HOSTAGE SCREAMS IN HORROR AS HE IS BEHEADED

By NILES LATHEM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 12, 2004 -- WASHINGTON - A young American contractor in Iraq was mercilessly beheaded by Islamic terrorists on a horrifying videotape released yesterday as so-called revenge for the abuse of Iraqi prisoners.
The sickening video, posted on an al Qaeda-linked Web site, shows a killer identified as terror boss Abu Musab Zarqawi sawing off the head of a screaming Nick Berg.

He commits the savage murder after reading a lengthy diatribe vowing more slayings for the "satanic degradation" of Muslims in the Abu Ghraib prison.

Berg's severed head is then held before the camera.

The brutal killing recalled the murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, who was also beheaded.

Like Pearl, Berg was Jewish, although the latest murderers apparently did not mention his religion in their statement.

The grisly tape was released just hours after U.S. authorities confirmed that a beheaded body found hanging from a bridge near coalition headquarters Saturday was that of Berg, 26, a Philadelphia-area resident who went missing on April 9.

In the video, five men wearing headscarves and black ski masks stand over Berg, who is wearing an orange jumpsuit similar to a prison uniform.

"My name is Nick Berg. My father's name is Michael," the pale and terrified Berg says moments before he is murdered on the stomach-churning death tape.

"My mother's name is Suzanne. I have a brother and sister David and Sarah," continues the kneeling and bound Berg.

Then, one of the hooded fanatics reads a lengthy statement denouncing President Bush as a "dog of the Christians" and vowing revenge for the prison abuse scandal.

"Nation of Islam. Is there any excuse left to sit idly by? And how can free Muslims sleep soundly as they see Islam being slaughtered, honor bleeding, photographs of shame and reports of satanic degradation of the people of Islam, men and women in Abu Ghraib prison," says the speaker.

As the tape continues, one of the masked men pushes Berg sideways to the ground and he begins to scream.

To shouts of "Allahu akbar" (God is great), Zarqawi thrusts a large knife into his neck and saws off his head.

After the killing, the masked monsters proudly hold up the severed head to the cameras.

The video was posted on the Muntada al-Ansar Web site, well known as a bulletin board for statements from al Qaeda and other Islamic terror groups.

The Web site's headline title for the video was "Abu Musab al-Zarqawi slaughtering an American."

Zarqawi is an al Qaeda-linked Jordanian arch terrorist responsible for numerous bombings and other terrorist attacks in Iraq over the past year.

He also is sought in the assassination of a U.S. diplomat in Jordan in 2002.

U.S. intelligence officials could not confirm that the man who did the killing was Zarqawi. They noted that the voice of the speaker on the tape appeared to be different from the voice on other audio tapes that have been released in Zarqawi's name in recent weeks.

The speaker on the videotape did the actual killing.

Although he is often identified as al Qaeda's leader in Iraq, Zarqawi, in fact, runs his own terrorist network that is allied with Osama bin Laden, but does not take orders from him.

In the video, the executioners said they had tried to trade Berg for prisoners at Abu Ghraib.

"For the mothers and wives of American soldiers, we tell you that we offered the U.S. administration to exchange this hostage for some of the detainees in Abu Ghraib and they refused," one of the men read from a statement.

"So we tell you that the dignity of the Muslim men and women in Abu Ghraib and others is not redeemed except by blood and souls. You will not receive anything from us but coffins after coffins . . . slaughtered in this way."

The State Department had informed Berg's anguished family of the grisly killing on Monday.

"I knew he was decapitated before," Berg's father Michael told reporters. "That means is preferable to a long and torturous death. But I didn't want it to become public."

When first told that a videotape of the killing was posted on the Internet, the elder Berg and his two surviving children kneeled slowly to the ground in the front yard in West Chester, Pa., and wept as they hugged each other for comfort.

Berg had his own TV antenna business and had been in Iraq looking for work helping rebuild the infrastructure when he went missing.

His family said he had been held for unknown reasons by new Iraq security forces for a few weeks in March.

Berg's parents said they last heard from their son on April 9 when he told them he had been released a few days earlier and was on his way home to Philadelphia.

Military officials said his body was found Saturday hanging upside down from a bridge near U.S. headquarters.

His severed head was left underneath the body, officials said.

U.S. government counter-terrorism officials said the videotaped beheading appeared to be designed by Zarqawi to capitalize on the worldwide outrage over the Abu Ghraib prison scandal and weaken the will of an increasingly anxious American public to support the U.S. war effort in Iraq.

There are fears that other Western hostages, including an American soldier and three Italian security guards known to be in captivity, could also face grave danger in the days ahead, if they are in the hands of Zarqawi's group.

Officials noted that videotaped decapitation is a gruesome but standard al Qaeda tactic.

Islamic fighters in the Afghan war against the Soviet Union made numerous videotapes of beheadings of captured Russian soldiers that were sent home to their families.

And more recently, al Qaeda-linked militants videotaped the beheading of Pearl, who was kidnapped in Pakistan in 2002.

Yesterday Pearl's wife, Marianne, was too upset to discuss Berg's murder, her lawyer said.

Re: U.S. hostage screams in horror as he is beheaded.

Posted: Wed May 12, 2004 11:11 am
by lukpac
Matt wrote:This disgusts and saddens me to no end.


It disgusts me too. But keep in mind our reaction to this is most likely the same as that of the Arab world to the prision situation. Just replace "those evil Arabs" with "those evil Americans".

Posted: Wed May 12, 2004 11:44 am
by Matt
I see what you are saying Luke. I think it is possbile they would have killed him even without knowledge of the recent prison abuse. Just like the four other US contractors recently. (No question the prison abuse is influential and has many angered)

Posted: Wed May 12, 2004 12:18 pm
by lukpac
That's probably the case. I'm not defending the people who did this. I just think people need to take a step back and realize that much of what we are doing is inciting the same anger over there as this has over here.

Posted: Wed May 12, 2004 1:26 pm
by Grant
Bush never should have gone over there in the first place...the asshole...

Posted: Wed May 12, 2004 1:49 pm
by Rspaight
I'm really kind of surprised that so many people are shocked that such atrocities are taking place. This is a war and really ugly shit goes down in a war. No matter how high-minded you are going in, you'll hit the lowest common denominator of human depravity pretty damn fast.

Is what happened to Nick Berg sickening and infuriating? Of course it is. Why was it done? To make us sick and infuriated.

We'll go ape again, like we did in Fallujah, and kill a whole bunch of people, and in the process make a whole new set of people really, really mad at us. The more Iraqis hate us, the more power the insurgents have. Then they'll do something grisly to another American, and we'll start this all over again. By responding with brutal force, we only empower the enemy.

Does that sound familiar? It should. We are now Israel and Iraq is now Palestine. I can only hope that this doesn't go on as long as that has.

Ryan

Posted: Wed May 12, 2004 2:21 pm
by Rspaight
Here's a lovely little sentence:

The White House condemned the killing, which it said reinforced its insistence that US abuses of prisoners paled in comparison with the crimes of its enemies.


Full story here.

So, the White House is trying to say that we're bad, but not as bad as Arab terrorists? Our atrocities are OK because they're not as nasty as their atrocities?

Talk about being a beacon of high standards for the world to follow.

Ryan

Posted: Wed May 12, 2004 2:24 pm
by lukpac
Rspaight wrote:being a beacon


And give him he...help, whenever he wants.

Posted: Wed May 12, 2004 5:44 pm
by Patrick M
Why haven't our "friends" in Saudi Arabia condemned this execution?

Posted: Wed May 12, 2004 7:19 pm
by Rspaight
Could it be.... this?

Death by Beheading
Saudi Arabia also has one of the highest rates of executions in the world. This sentence can be applied to a wide range of offenses including 'witchcraft' and 'sexual crimes' both considered 'corruption on earth'.

The death sentence - by beheading - is often carried out in public in what's know to locals as 'Chop-Chop' Square in Riyadh. Saudi ambassador designate to Britain claims that "We do not consider the punishment of beheading as either abhorrent or against human rights." The punishment for death is beheading under the law of the Shariah.

Prisoners often receive no warning that they are about to be executed. They are taken to a public square, blindfolded and forced to kneel and are beheaded. Most prisoners are not allowed to visit with family before they are executed, in fact, most families are notified only after the prisoner is dead.


Other fun facts about that country we're good buddies with (same source):

The Shariah
Criminal cases in Saudi Arabia are heard by the General Sharia (or Islamic court). The last stage of judical review is by the Supreme Judical Council. This 11-member body reviews judgements handed down in major cases. In cases of captial punishment the sentence needs to be approved by the Royal court. These courts interpret the Shariah or Islamic law. The Shariah is known as 'the word of God' and is based upon the Koran.

Many of the laws are vaguely worded which means individuals can be arrested and imprisoned on religious or political grounds. Once arrested detainees are held incommunicado and are denied any contact with family members or lawyers.

Reports of Frequent Torture
Prisoners have stated that they were forced to sign false confessions. Methods of getting prisoners to sign include electric shock, cigarette burns, nail-pulling, beatings and threats to family members. There are reports that some prisoners have died as a result.

Secret Court Hearings
The prisoners frequently know nothing about their cases, do not attend their trials and often aren't even informed when they have been convicted. This adds to unnecessary suffering because many have no idea why or how long they will be in jail or whether they face execution.

Court hearings are held in secret which means that the families of the defendants as well as the general public are denied the right to be present. The hearings last between five minutes and two hours - even for the most serious cases.

No guaranteed legal defense
Defendants have no right to a lawyer and have little opportunity to mount a defense. Many are denied the right to call witnesses and evidence that may have been gathered during the investigation is hidden from the defendant. The judge acts as the defendant's lawyer and questions the prosecution.

Acccording to Amnesty International while some laws in Saudi Arabia refer to detainees having lawyers, it is rare.

Defendants can be convicted solely on the basis of confessions which may have been extracted by torture. Many people are suffering in Saudi prisons because they were forced to sign these 'false' confessions.

Corporal Punishment
Flogging and amputation of limbs are used extensively as judicial punishments. They can be applied to many offences ranging from alcohol and sexual offenses to theft. Men, women and children are flogged in prisons and in public squares around the country. There is no upper limit on the number of lashes judges can order. The most lashes ever recorded was 4,000 given to an Egyptian national who was convicted of robbery.


Surely it would be overobvious at this point to mention the parallels to the direction we're moving in this country.

More on "chop-chop square" from an oddly peppy report from an American who lived there:

One of the more gruesome parts of living in Saudi was “chop-chop square”. This was an open courtyard area just off the gold souks where each Friday punishment was meted out to the criminals convicted of serious crimes as robbery, drug dealing or murder. Islamic law requires a thief to have his right hand cut off; this punishment can be administered after one offense but is usually not delivered until after multiple offenses.

Persons convicted of drug-related offenses, rape and murder all are beheaded. This is done today just as it was a thousand years ago; with a large curved sword. A modern twist is often used in that the person is usually drugged and often has some of their blood removed just before execution so the scene is not so messy.

If a Westerner is near chop-chop square and an execution is about to commence, they are often shoved to the front of the crowd for a close up view of Saudi (or Islamic) justice. I never witnessed these events, but I knew some who did, and it wasn’t very pleasant. Regardless of your opinion of this form of “justice”, they do not have a very high crime rate in Saudi Arabia!


Ryan

Posted: Thu May 13, 2004 6:06 pm
by Matt
I think many want to attribute this murder as an exclusive war time act (and as a direct criticism of Bush).

I think to be fair we must consider that this murder carried out by the Al Qaeda, who also carried out the unprovoked 9/11 attacks. I feel if they couldn't blame this murder on the prison scandal (Did we behead any prisoners?), they would have found another bull shit reason to kill an American.

Posted: Thu May 13, 2004 7:53 pm
by Rspaight
I think many want to attribute this murder as an exclusive war time act (and as a direct criticism of Bush).


Well, Bush is the one who turned Iraq into an al Qaeda recruiting center. And Bush's business cronies are the ones who suckered people like Berg into going over there to make money before security was in place.

And Berg's parents blame Bush for the murder, because the US kept him in custody for 13 days for no apparent reason, during which time the uprising flared up and prevented him from safely leaving the country. The Administration initially lied about this and claimed only the Iraqi police had held him, until the family produced e-mails that proved the US had him.

(Did we behead any prisoners?)


Not that I know of, but we did murder some and cover it up:

In its most chilling lines, Frederick's journal describes the death in November of an Iraqi described as an "OGA prisoner" - an abbreviation for "Other Government Agency," military jargon for the CIA and other nonmilitary agencies.

"They stressed him out so bad that the man passed away," Frederick writes. The corpse was packed in ice and later prepared to suggest falsely that the prisoner had died under medical care: "The next day the medics came in and put his body on a stretcher, placed a fake I.V. [intravenous drip] in his arm and took him away. This OGA [prisoner] was never processed and therefore never had a number."


I think to be fair we must consider that this murder carried out by the Al Qaeda, who also carried out the unprovoked 9/11 attacks.


True enough. Which again raises the question -- why are we wasting time, money and lives on Iraq instead of al Qaeda?

Ryan

Posted: Thu May 13, 2004 8:57 pm
by Matt
Well, Bush is the one who turned Iraq into an al Qaeda recruiting center. And Bush's business cronies are the ones who suckered people like Berg into going over there to make money before security was in place


Berg had to have known he was going to be in a dangerous place in the world and taking a risk.

Not that I know of, but we did murder some and cover it up:


If this is true, I certainly will stand corrected.

More on Frederick's plight: http://www.examiner.com/article/index.cfm/i/051104b_frederick

True enough. Which again raises the question -- why are we wasting time, money and lives on Iraq instead of al Qaeda?


I can not answer this. Maybe Bush bit off more than he bargained for.

Posted: Thu May 13, 2004 9:36 pm
by lukpac
Matt wrote:I can not answer this. Maybe Bush bit off more than he bargained for.


Now we're getting somewhere...

Posted: Thu May 13, 2004 9:40 pm
by Rspaight
Berg had to have known he was going to be in a dangerous place in the world and taking a risk.


True. No one forced him to go there.



That sounds a lot like what Lynndie England is saying. On the one hand, you would expect them to defend themselves in this way, but on the other a lot of what the government's told us so far has been understatement.

We haven't heard the end of this by a long shot. There's a lot of mounting evidence out there pointing to military intelligence as being hip-deep in the muck. I'm not sure where the truth lies, but I suspect we're not going to come out of it looking that good.

Ryan