Forums dot lukpac.org

A place to discuss music and Mallard Fillmore
It is currently Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:55 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Posts: 4384
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Either all the right-wing pundits have lapsed into Oxycontin-induced fantasias, or the orders have come down that they all must indulge in half-assed "what-if" scenarios inspired by the 9/11 Commission:

Gregg Easterbrook:

http://www.tnr.com/easterbrook.mhtml?pid=1545

Kathleen Parker:

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/kath ... 0410.shtml

Peggy Noonan:

http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/

They say great minds think alike -- what's the reason for this?

Ryan

_________________
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 6:54 pm 
Offline
Top Dog and Sellout
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: Madison, WI
Uh huh.

So we're supposed to be happy for the Bush administration because of something they didn't actually do?

_________________
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 6:33 pm
Posts: 1714
Location: LukPac Land
lukpac wrote:
So we're supposed to be happy for the Bush administration because of something they didn't actually do?

No, you're supposed to recognize the analogous situation in Iraq and realize that the U.S. was justified in taking preemptive action.

You're also supposed to realize that, in the eyes of some people, W is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 8:38 pm 
Offline
Top Dog and Sellout
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: Madison, WI
Patrick M wrote:
No, you're supposed to recognize the analogous situation in Iraq and realize that the U.S. was justified in taking preemptive action.


That begs the question, *what* "analogous situation in Iraq"?

Let's see...he didn't do something when he should have, and did something when he shouldn't have. Perfect!

Quote:
You're also supposed to realize that, in the eyes of some people, W is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.


And with good reason...

_________________
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 9:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2003 9:20 pm
Posts: 67
Well, I didn't think Noonan was a "conservative" columnist, but it is interesting how all these columnists seemed to follow the same theme at the same time. Of course, the arguments advanced are largely specious, as the intelligence on Al Quida prior to 9/11 was far more concrete than anything we've ever had on Iraq. After all, the organization had successfully bombed a number of U.S. targets by that time, and Clinton had blocked the millinium scheme. Moreover, these guys apparently forget the reason we went into Afghanistan. They were harboring Al Quida and wouldn't turn them over or cooperate. If Bush had gone in blasting like he did in Iraq, the scenarios painted by these columnists wouldn't have been that far out of touch. We never went to war against the "innocent people" of Afghanistan, but rather removed a brutal regime that was harboring known terrorists. It's apples and oranges with our Iraq policy.

It's a slippery slope when we start using hindsight to justify aggression. The U.S. (prior to this administration) has seldom if ever conducted its foreign policy in an offensive (as opposed to defensive) manner, and it sets a dangerous precedent. Knowing what we now now about Nazi Germany, is anyone willing to say the U.S. would have been justified in invading Germany and restoring democracy there before 1939? The good guys aren't supposed to conduct war on non-agressors in order to advance their interests- that's what bad guys do...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 10, 2004 9:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Posts: 4384
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Quote:
Well, I didn't think Noonan was a "conservative" columnist


Well, she writes for the Wall Street Journal's op-ed page, which is a good start. Here's her bio from the WSJ's opinionjournal.com site:

Quote:
Peggy Noonan is a contributing editor of The Wall Street Journal. She is also a contributing editor of Time magazine and Good Housekeeping, a member of the board of the Manhattan Institute and author, most recently, of "A Heart, A Cross, And A Flag: America Today," (Wall Street Journal Books), a collection of her OpinionJournal essays. Ms. Noonan was special assistant to President Ronald Reagan. In 1988 she was chief speechwriter for Vice President George Bush as he ran for the presidency. Her first book, "What I Saw at the Revolution: A Political Life in the Reagan Era," was published in 1990. She is also author of "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness" (1994), "On Speaking Well" (1998), and "The Case Against Hillary Clinton" (2000) and "When Character Was King" (2001)


Sounds righty to me.

Ryan

_________________
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 11:53 pm 
Offline
Top Dog and Sellout
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: Madison, WI
Rspaight wrote:
Quote:
Well, I didn't think Noonan was a "conservative" columnist


Well, she writes for the Wall Street Journal's op-ed page, which is a good start. Here's her bio from the WSJ's opinionjournal.com site:

Quote:
Peggy Noonan is a contributing editor of The Wall Street Journal. She is also a contributing editor of Time magazine and Good Housekeeping, a member of the board of the Manhattan Institute and author, most recently, of "A Heart, A Cross, And A Flag: America Today," (Wall Street Journal Books), a collection of her OpinionJournal essays. Ms. Noonan was special assistant to President Ronald Reagan. In 1988 she was chief speechwriter for Vice President George Bush as he ran for the presidency. Her first book, "What I Saw at the Revolution: A Political Life in the Reagan Era," was published in 1990. She is also author of "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness" (1994), "On Speaking Well" (1998), and "The Case Against Hillary Clinton" (2000) and "When Character Was King" (2001)


Sounds righty to me.

Ryan


http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-m ... oney-tunes

_________________
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group