Republicans advocate dismantling US government

Expect plenty of disagreement. Just keep it civil.
User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Republicans advocate dismantling US government

Postby Rspaight » Tue Mar 16, 2004 9:44 am

Check out HR 3920, introduced by (I'm so proud) Ron Lewis of KY.

Here's his press release:

Accountability for Judicial Activism Act Introduced in House
Rep. Lewis introduces landmark legislation to override SCOTUS decisions

WASHINGTON, D.C.— March 9, 2004 – U.S. Representative Ron Lewis (R-KY) today introduced The Congressional Accountability for Judicial Activism Act (H.R. 3920), legislation that would allow Congress, by a 2/3rds vote in each house, to override certain future decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. The bill was drafted in an effort to redress recent cases of activist judicial rulings.

“America’s judicial branch has become increasingly overreaching and disconnected from the values of everyday Americans,” said Lewis. “The recent actions taken by courts in Massachusetts and elsewhere are demonstrative of a single branch of government taking upon itself the singular ability to legislate. These actions usurp the will of the governed by allowing a select few to conclusively rule on issues that are radically reshaping our nation’s traditions.”

Lewis’ proposed legislation, designed to preserve equal dignity among branches of government, would only be applicable to rulings concerning the constitutionality of an Act of Congress following passage. Lewis, a strong supporter of numerous legislative measures aimed to define marriage as an exclusive union between a man and a woman, believes a more comprehensive solution is necessary to address the broader issue of activist courts; a concern he believes has troubling implications beyond just the issue of marriage.

“The framers of the Constitution were advocates of serious debate who believed that the deliberation of the political process should always be open to the people. As the courts continue to expand their power of judicial review, I believe Congress, as the people’s branch of representative government, should take steps to equally affirm our authority to interpret constitutional issues.”

The right of judicial review is a practice with origins from the bench itself, established by the 1803 Marbury v. Madison decision, and is not expressly provided for in the Constitution. Many argue that the exercise of such broad judicial authority, expanded over time and by political tradition, has a growing adverse affect on co-equal branches of government.

“As judicial power expands, Congressional power contracts,” said Lewis. “This is especially true when the power to interpret the Constitution rests in the hands of activist judges anxious to find the latest ‘right’ hiding between the lines of our founding document.”

The Congressional Accountability for Judicial Activism Act is gaining early support from numerous Member of Congress including eleven original co-sponsors. Lewis hopes his legislation will encourage serious bipartisan debate on the growing imbalance of constitutional authority between legislative and judicial branches of government.


Gee, I guess they were right when they said that gay marriage would cause the foundations of our society to crumble.

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

User avatar
Patrick M
Posts: 1714
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: LukPac Land

Postby Patrick M » Tue Mar 16, 2004 2:25 pm

"America's judicial branch has become increasingly overreaching and disconnected from the values of everyday Americans," said Lewis.

There for a minute, I thought he was talking about the 2000 election.

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Tue Mar 16, 2004 4:18 pm

Wouldn't it be cool if this gets passed, the Supremes strike it down as unconstitutional, Congress overrides them, the Supremes strike down the override, Congress overrides the striking down of the override, and so on until the whole of D.C. vanishes in a massive causality loop?

Seriously, this would have to be a Constitutional amendment, as if we needed more of those right now.

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4591
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Tue Mar 16, 2004 5:33 pm

Did this guy fail Civics 101?

"We want to be able to pass un-Constitutional laws, but since the Supreme Court would strike them down, we'll pass a (un-Constitutional) law that lets us override them."

Huh?
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

Ron
Posts: 489
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 4:11 am
Location: Far Away From All You Fellas

Postby Ron » Tue Mar 16, 2004 6:51 pm

One difference between Democrats and Republicans is that Republicans never learned to suppress the child within that wants what it wants and wants it now. Never satisfied, enough is never enough. And it must get its way all the time. And if you call them on it, e.g., "crooks" and "liars" they scream like a bunch of little girls. [BTW, you've got to wonder why Ralph Nader's an Independent.]
Dr. Ron :mrgreen:TM "Do it 'till you're sick of it. Do it 'till you can't do it no more." Jesse Winchester