Rspaight wrote:Anybody who lets Bush gets re-elected because they don't think Kerry is progressive enough is a moron. Have we learned nothing from Nader in 2000?
It was kind of funny, in a sad way, seeing Michael Moore courting Wes Clark.
Rspaight wrote:Anybody who lets Bush gets re-elected because they don't think Kerry is progressive enough is a moron. Have we learned nothing from Nader in 2000?
Ryan
chrischross wrote:Where did you suppose that I won't vote for Kerry when/if he gets the nomination. Don't jump to conclusions so quickly!!!
All I'm saying is that Edwards is more "political" than Kerry. That bodes well for him if he can get the nomination. The jury is out on whether or not the 7-foot tall Dukakis can deliver in the general election. I just don't want to wake up on November 3rd facing four more years of Bush.
Rspaight wrote:Edwards is a popular guy who campaigns well, but his lack of experience would be a factor. Four years in the Senate isn't enough seasoning for a frightened electorate (though he seems infinitely more up to the task than Bush did in 2000).
lukpac wrote:On the other hand, Kerry's record could haunt him. That's not to say it's a bad record (I haven't studied it), but there's more than enough to pick out stuff out of context.