Page 1 of 1
More Political Action Figures
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2003 2:25 pm
by Rspaight
Following the Flight Suit Bush of a few months ago, now there's this company with a full line of products, starting with their version of the classic (called "Top Gun George W. Bush"). These talk, too. I like the vaguely Barbie-ish Ann Coulter doll.
http://www.talkingpresidents.com/index.shtml
Ryan
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 2:37 am
by mikenycLI
When's the Rush Limbaugh doll coming out...oh, wait, it's still in rehab, right ?
Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2003 8:06 am
by Rspaight
I think the packaging and shipping costs for the Rush doll were prohibitive.
Ryan
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2003 12:26 pm
by Matt
Nice site, how about this talking Clinton doll?
Sample Phrases:
The first man put at the helm will be a good one...
It depends on what the meaning of the word is, is.
we have to change the way government works...
I have to give up being the funny one in my family.
I did not have sexual relations...
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2003 12:34 pm
by Matt
mikenycLI wrote:When's the Rush Limbaugh doll coming out...oh, wait, it's still in rehab, right ?
Speaking of new dolls I hope they have a Wesley Clark doll soon. Or, rather, a Wesley Clark sock puppet included with the Clinton doll.
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2003 3:24 pm
by mikenycLI
Matt wrote:mikenycLI wrote:When's the Rush Limbaugh doll coming out...oh, wait, it's still in rehab, right ?
Speaking of new dolls I hope they have a Wesley Clark doll soon. Or, rather, a Wesley Clark sock puppet included with the Clinton doll.
Clinton is behind Clark, doing the horizontal hoola !
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2003 6:40 pm
by Rspaight
I'd rather have Bill Clinton's sock puppet than Dick Cheney's sock puppet...
Ryan
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2003 11:36 pm
by lukpac
Matt wrote:Speaking of new dolls I hope they have a Wesley Clark doll soon. Or, rather, a Wesley Clark sock puppet included with the Clinton doll.
And this I don't quite understand. I realize Clinton seems to be supporting Clark, but he still is the guy who *fired* Clark after Kosovo.
Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2003 12:46 am
by Patrick M
There was a good article in Time (IIRC) about Clark a few weeks back. It discussed how Clark was not so much "fired" as "pushed out of the way" so another general could be promoted before retirement.
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2003 1:58 pm
by Matt
Patrick M wrote:There was a good article in Time (IIRC) about Clark a few weeks back. It discussed how Clark was not so much "fired" as "pushed out of the way" so another general could be promoted before retirement.
Patrick, I am very curious, did you honestly believe that article in Time was completely truthfull?
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2003 2:15 pm
by Matt
lukpac wrote:Matt wrote:Speaking of new dolls I hope they have a Wesley Clark doll soon. Or, rather, a Wesley Clark sock puppet included with the Clinton doll.
And this I don't quite understand. I realize Clinton seems to be supporting Clark, but he still is the guy who *fired* Clark after Kosovo.
Some felt that Clark was only used as needed, fired and then Clinton supports him again now (and only because) he is running.
I am unclear on Clark being fired, was it solely his recommendation on attacking the Russians?
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2003 2:43 pm
by Patrick M
Matt wrote:Patrick, I am very curious, did you honestly believe that article in Time was completely truthfull?
a) Did you read the article?
b) Do you honestly believe what Rush Limbaugh tells you?
Of course, I don't believe anything in the mass media news outlets, as they are all run by twisted liberals.
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2003 3:08 pm
by Rspaight
I am unclear on Clark being fired, was it solely his recommendation on attacking the Russians?
Not from most of what I'm hearing -- the order to prevent the Russians from occupying the airport came from higher up. The Brits balked, there was much spirited discussion, and the whole point became moot for some reason I don't remember.
I was also under the impression that Clark was fired less because of the airport incident than because he was appearing on TV too much for the Pentagon's tastes.
Ryan
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2003 4:07 pm
by Matt
Patrick M wrote:Matt wrote:Patrick, I am very curious, did you honestly believe that article in Time was completely truthfull?
a) Did you read the article?
b) Do you honestly believe what Rush Limbaugh tells you?
Of course, I don't believe anything in the mass media news outlets, as they are all run by twisted liberals.
A. No.
B. No, he is an extremist and I do not listen to him.
So, you did believe the article. I would never suggest that Time tends to be biased to the left.
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2003 4:23 pm
by Patrick M
I'm not even sure it was Time. I'm generally too cheap to buy magazines, so I go to the grocery and treat it like a library.