The 2012 Republican Nominee?
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 3:13 pm
A place to discuss music and Mallard Fillmore
http://forums.lukpac.org/
lukpac wrote:It's the white people, stupid.
Can somebody point out to me who has called Obama "the chosen one", "the messiah", or "an African god"?
Lance Hall wrote:Well Obama did say something like "WE are who you've been waiting for..." which I took to mean he sees himself as the Liberal Messiah (in political terms not religous)... ie, the ONE to finally finish the work started by FDR and others.
Lance Hall wrote:I don't care since I'm voting Libertarian as usual.
Bennett Cerf wrote:Which type are you?
Bennett Cerf wrote:The line was "We are the ones we've been waiting for." But even if he had said it your way, I'd find your interpretation bizarre.
lukpac wrote:It's the white people, stupid.
Can somebody point out to me who has called Obama "the chosen one", "the messiah", or "an African god"?
I'm the kind that want's government out of our wallets and out of our bedroom.
I'm the kind that wants to see the Corporatist Party and the Socialist Party loseing power all around.
While you guys are just swinging the pendulum to the opposite side every 4 years
I'm actually supporting a different way and have since 1990s.
it all goes to a self-delusion of greatness and importance
Limbaugh and Hannity
Limbaugh did say Obama sees himself as an "African dictator" or some such. And no that's not racist.
Rspaight wrote:The US currently has the lowest taxation it's had since Truman was President, which is reflected in the towering debt. How much farther "out of our wallets" should it go?
Who's the Socialist Party?
Yes, if its a pendulum that goes from right of center to just a little right of center.
How's that worked out?
I don't think it's a delusion for the President of the United States to consider himself important. But honestly, I don't see any more out-of-control ego coming from Obama compared to any other politician at the national level. You have to be a raging egomaniac to get into that business in the first place.
Lance Hall wrote:If you believe the Federal government should be an increasing (and eventually sole) deliverer of good and services then you are by definition a socialist. Their goal is to get 51% plus of the electorate to be completely dependant on the State so that they will be in power forever. Shouldn't our goal be to have FEWER people dependant on the State?? I'm not talking about the retired, or the elderly, or the disabled, or the most poor who clearly need assistance, I'm talking about middle class and lower class people. I think they should be able to keep enough money and there be enough opportunity (via an economy constantly needing demand filled as stated above) to be able to climb up the economic ladder and save. You can't progress to a higher rung on the ladder if the higher rungs are not there. In a Stateist system everyone stagnates while the Leaders wax eloquently about their "compassion" and the "fairness and equity" they've brought forth to the People. Of course Stateism it's a false ideology put forth by people who ultimately have no real compassion for the Poeple but only an insatiable thirst for total power. Stateists have destroyed all the economic systems they have got their hands on. While the public debt skyrockets, the real economy shrinks and the People suffer. History has seen these people many times before, most with disasterous results.
Eh, I'd think most people would agree the pendulum is pretty far left of center right now. Maybe you guys up in Wisconsin would call Obama moderate-centrist but that's because y'all live in your own little ideological bubble like the Berkley crowd and the People's Republic of Massachusets.
David R. Modny wrote: Unless your prepared...
your hell-bent...