Page 1 of 1

"9/11 was the fault of the Clinton Administration"

Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:18 pm
by lukpac
Stumbled across this via Google News:

Polls Looking Up For Bush/Republicans

Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:46 pm
by Bennett Cerf
Don't be silly. It was all Warren Harding's fault.

Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 4:57 pm
by Rspaight
I blame Carter. Damn peanut farmer.

Ryan

Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:52 am
by krabapple
I blame God. Fuck Him.

Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 1:02 pm
by MK
I blame Bush the elder. And Barbara. Goddammit, why couldn't you horny bastards keep yer knickers on?

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 11:25 am
by MK
"This is NOT a documentary........but it was Clinton's fault."

New ABC Docudrama Blames Clinton For 9/11, Praises Bush

Path to 9/11 graphic On September 10 and 11, ABC will air a “docudrama” called “The Path to 9/11.” It was written by Cyrus Nowrasteh, who describes himself as “more of a libertarian than a strict conservative,” and is giving interviews to hard-right sites like FrontPageMag to promote the film.

What will it say about President Clinton? Here’s Rush Limbaugh with a preview:

A friend of mine [Cyrus Nowrasteh] out in California has produced and filmed — I think it’s a two-part mini-series on 9/11 that ABC is going to run in prime-time over two nights, close to or on 9/11. It’s sort of surprising that ABC’s picked it up, to me. I’ve had a lot of people tell me about it, my friends told me about it…And from what I have been told, the film really zeros in on the shortcomings of the Clinton administration in doing anything about militant Islamofascism or terrorism during its administration. It cites failures of Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright and Sandy Burglar.

How does it deal with President Bush? Salon has a review:

Condoleezza Rice gets that fated memo about planes flying into buildings, and makes it very clear to anyone who’ll listen just how concerned President Bush is about these terrorist threats — despite the fact that we’re given little concrete evidence of the president’s concern or interest in taking action. Maybe my memory fails me, but the only person I remember talking about Osama bin Laden back in 1998 was President Clinton, while the current anti-terrorist stalwarts worked the country into a frenzy over what? Blow jobs. In the end, “The Path to 9/11″ feels like an excruciatingly long, winding and deceptive path, indeed.

The director of the film, David Cunningham, is already backtracking about its accuracy, saying “this is not a documentary.” OK, fair enough. But the movie is being billed as “based on The 9/11 Commission Report.”

Digg It!

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 11:36 am
by Rspaight
Sandy Burglar! Oh, my aching sides!

Ryan

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 1:50 pm
by MK
He's not Michael Medved:

wikipedia.org wrote:Another common theme of Medved's political and cultural commentary is the labeling of certain social or political forces, political candidates, and movies with insulting nicknames. Examples of these nicknames include:

* Wesley Clark as "Weaselly" Clark
* John Edwards as John "Shyster"
* Libertarian Party as the "Losertarians"
* Constitution Party the "Constipation Party"
* Green Party the "Spleen Party"
* "turd parties," in reference to all third parties in general
* "Alexander the Gay," in reference to the 2004 motion picture Alexander.
* Hollywood as "Hollyweird"


Man, I can't understand how Mike Judge, Matt Groening, Matt Stone and Trey Parker can dismiss Medved's criticism, 'cause he's obviously a comedic genius.

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:37 am
by CitizenDan
"Hollyweird"! Hey, that's a new one!

Wait, it isn't 1986?