Stars join anti-war hunger strike

Expect plenty of disagreement. Just keep it civil.
Matt
Posts: 539
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 11:24 pm
What color are leaves?: Green
Spam?: No
Location: People's Republic of Maryland

Stars join anti-war hunger strike

Postby Matt » Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:19 am

:roll:

Stars join anti-war hunger strike

Hollywood stars Sean Penn and Susan Sarandon are to join a fast protesting against the Iraq war.

Protestors will each give up food for 24 hours, with the "rolling fast" due to last until International Peace Day on 21 September.

The protest has been organised by CodePink, a woman's anti-war group who are concerned at the loss of life on both sides of the Iraq conflict.

Other celebrities due to take part include Willie Nelson and Danny Glover.

Around 150 protestors began the fast outside the White House on Tuesday morning, including leading anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan, whose son died in Iraq.

Oscar-winner Penn is one of Hollywood's most vocal stars over the issue of war in Iraq.

He visited the country in 2002 and 2003, meeting politicians, visiting a water treatment plant and touring a children's hospital.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/entertainment/5144888.stm
-Matt

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Wed Jul 05, 2006 1:31 pm

At least they're not protesting freedom of the press.

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

Matt
Posts: 539
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 11:24 pm
What color are leaves?: Green
Spam?: No
Location: People's Republic of Maryland

Postby Matt » Wed Jul 05, 2006 2:24 pm

Freedom of the press? Perhaps, but it wasn't necessary to publish that. I think it was done out of spite.

At any rate, I wonder if Michael Moore will fast?
-Matt

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4591
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Wed Jul 05, 2006 2:29 pm

Matt wrote:Freedom of the press? Perhaps, but it wasn't necessary to publish that. I think it was done out of spite.


Huh? Out of spite of what?
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

Matt
Posts: 539
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 11:24 pm
What color are leaves?: Green
Spam?: No
Location: People's Republic of Maryland

Postby Matt » Wed Jul 05, 2006 2:38 pm

The times is biased and hates Bush. If they can make him look bad, they certainly will in any way that they can.
-Matt

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Wed Jul 05, 2006 2:43 pm

Why does the SWIFT program make Bush look bad? I thought the right was mad because the NYT was exposing "war secrets" or something.

In any case, the Times carried plenty of water for Bush with Judith Miller's WMD hype back in '02. Don't they get any credit for that?

Ryan
Last edited by Rspaight on Wed Jul 05, 2006 2:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4591
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Wed Jul 05, 2006 2:44 pm

Matt wrote:The times is biased and hates Bush. If they can make him look bad, they certainly will in any way that they can.


http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/me ... ures/9226/
http://www.slate.com/id/2086110/
http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature ... index.html
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

User avatar
Jeff
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 5:54 pm

Postby Jeff » Wed Jul 05, 2006 2:45 pm

Gee, Matt, do you agree with Ann Coulter that Tim McVeigh should have blown up the Times building while he was at it?

I just wish there were more media outlets that catered to the rabid, frothing-at-the-mouth Conservative point of view. :wink:

Bennett Cerf
Posts: 738
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:54 pm

Postby Bennett Cerf » Wed Jul 05, 2006 3:55 pm

Matt wrote:At any rate, I wonder if Michael Moore will fast?


Haw haw haw! I get it! Michael Moore is fat!

Matt
Posts: 539
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 11:24 pm
What color are leaves?: Green
Spam?: No
Location: People's Republic of Maryland

Postby Matt » Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:36 pm

Rspaight wrote:Why does the SWIFT program make Bush look bad? I thought the right was mad because the NYT was exposing "war secrets" or something.

In any case, the Times carried plenty of water for Bush with Judith Miller's WMD hype back in '02. Don't they get any credit for that?

Ryan


Ryan, I think any leak like that, which happens on Bush's watch, is ultimately viewed by many (fair or not ) as a poor reflection of his administration.

As far as Judith Miller goes, that is more of an exception, in my opinion, than a common occurence. I think the times deserves credit for that.
Last edited by Matt on Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-Matt

Matt
Posts: 539
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 11:24 pm
What color are leaves?: Green
Spam?: No
Location: People's Republic of Maryland

Postby Matt » Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:38 pm

lukpac wrote:
Matt wrote:The times is biased and hates Bush. If they can make him look bad, they certainly will in any way that they can.


http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/me ... ures/9226/
http://www.slate.com/id/2086110/
http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature ... index.html


Yes, a few exceptions, but how about http://www.timeswatch.org?
-Matt

Matt
Posts: 539
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 11:24 pm
What color are leaves?: Green
Spam?: No
Location: People's Republic of Maryland

Postby Matt » Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:46 pm

Jeff wrote:Gee, Matt, do you agree with Ann Coulter that Tim McVeigh should have blown up the Times building while he was at it?

I just wish there were more media outlets that catered to the rabid, frothing-at-the-mouth Conservative point of view. :wink:


She said that? :D

(No, I wouldn't agree with her statement)
-Matt

Matt
Posts: 539
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 11:24 pm
What color are leaves?: Green
Spam?: No
Location: People's Republic of Maryland

Postby Matt » Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:48 pm

Bennett Cerf wrote:
Matt wrote:At any rate, I wonder if Michael Moore will fast?


Haw haw haw! I get it! Michael Moore is fat!


I'm personally hoping a Tinsley strip will cover the celebrity one day fast soon!
-Matt

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4591
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:59 pm

Matt wrote:As far as Judith Miller goes, that is more of an exception, in my opinion, than a common occurence. I think the times deserves credit for that.


Credit for what? Misinformation?
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

Matt
Posts: 539
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 11:24 pm
What color are leaves?: Green
Spam?: No
Location: People's Republic of Maryland

Postby Matt » Wed Jul 05, 2006 8:14 pm

lukpac wrote:
Matt wrote:As far as Judith Miller goes, that is more of an exception, in my opinion, than a common occurence. I think the times deserves credit for that.


Credit for what? Misinformation?


No, but the Times did at least give someone a chance to go against the grain, so to speak.
-Matt