Page 1 of 1

So much for Miers

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:07 am
by lukpac
No story up yet:

http://www.cnn.com/

BREAKING NEWS

President Bush "reluctantly" accepts Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers's request to withdraw her nomination.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:21 am
by lukpac
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/10/27/ ... index.html

Miers withdraws Supreme Court nomination

Thursday, October 27, 2005; Posted: 9:17 a.m. EDT (13:17 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush on Thursday accepted the withdrawal of Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers, according to a statement from the White House.

In her letter to the president, Miers said she was "concerned that the confirmation process presents a burden for the White House and its staff and it is not in the best interest of the country."

"It is clear that senators would not be satisfied until they gained access to internal documents concerning advice provided during her tenure at the White House -- disclosures that would undermine a president's ability to receive candid counsel," Bush said.

"Harriet Miers' decision demonstrates her deep respect for this essential aspect of the constitutional separation of powers -- and confirms my deep respect and admiration for her."

Miers, 60, was nominated earlier this month by President Bush to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor on the high court. (Profile)

Bush's decision to nominate Miers, his White House counsel and a longtime adviser, had divided his supporters, many of whom wanted a nominee with a clear record of opposition to abortion.

On Wednesday, White House spokesman Scott McClellan had dismissed the suggestion that senators were reluctant to come out in support of Miers because they are unimpressed with her as a nominee.

"I think you're seeing a lot of members of the Senate saying, 'We want to hear what she has to say in the hearings,' before they make a judgment," he said.

"With Harriet Miers, there are many in the Senate that simply did not know her previously, although she is widely respected within the legal profession."

Senators had hoped to begin confirmation hearings the week of November 7.

CNN's Dana Bash contributed to this report

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:38 am
by Rspaight
It's gonna be J.R. Brown now, or someone equally vile. Miers was never meant to be confirmed -- she was just a diversion to set the table for a right-wing nutjob. Here comes the real nominee.

It's amusing that apparently Harriet was yanked because of the Senate wanting to see documents from her work as White House counsel. Bush must have choked on a pretzel when he heard that:

Ryan

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:08 am
by Bennett Cerf
I have no doubt that the next nominee will be a right-wing nutjob. My hope is that Miers' rejection will make it easier to block nominee #2, leading to a comparatively decent nominee #3.

I don't think the White House counsel documents really had anything to do with her yanking. That's just the excuse they're using to save face. She was yanked because she was rejected by the extremists who run the Republican party.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:49 am
by MK
Yeah, the Dems may have blown this one. If I was them, I would've shored up support for Miers. Seriously, they got tossed a soft one, and when you see it floating towards you, TAKE A SWING.