Page 1 of 1

Kerry, Bush had similar C+ averages at Yale

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:04 am
by Matt
Kerry, Bush had similar C+ averages at Yale
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0607Kerry-Grades-ON.html#

Michael Kranish
Boston Globe
Jun. 7, 2005 07:44 AM

WASHINGTON - During last year's presidential campaign, John F. Kerry was the candidate often portrayed as intellectual and complex, while George W. Bush was the populist who mangled his sentences.

But newly released records show that Bush and Kerry had a virtually identical grade average at Yale University four decades ago.

In 1999, The New Yorker published a transcript indicating that Bush had received a cumulative score of 77 for his first three years at Yale and a roughly similar average under a non-numerical rating system during his senior year.

Kerry, who graduated two years before Bush, got a cumulative 76 for his four years, according to a transcript that Kerry sent to the Navy when he was applying for officer training school. He received four D's in his freshman year out of 10 courses, but improved his average in later years.

The grade transcript, which Kerry has always declined to release, was included in his Navy military record. During the campaign the Globe sought his naval records, but he refused to waive privacy restrictions for the full file. Late last month, Kerry gave the Navy permission to send the documents to the Globe.

Kerry appeared to be responding to critics who suspected that there might be damaging information in the file about his activities in Vietnam. The military and medical records, however, appear identical to what Kerry has already released. This marks the first time Kerry's grades have been publicly reported.

The transcript shows that Kerry's freshman-year average was 71. He scored a 61 in geology, a 63 and 68 in two history classes, and a 69 in political science. His top score was a 79, in another political science course. Another of his strongest efforts, a 77, came in French class.

Under Yale's grading system in effect at the time, grades between 90 and 100 equaled an A, 80-89 a B, 70-79 a C, 60 to 69 a D, and anything below that was a failing grade. In addition to Kerry's four D's in his freshman year, he received one D in his sophomore year, but he did not fail any courses.

"I always told my Dad that D stood for distinction," Kerry said Monday in a written response to questions, noting that he has previously acknowledged that he spent a lot of time learning to fly instead of focusing on his studies.

Kerry's weak grades came despite years of preparation in some of the world's most elite prep schools, ranging from Fessenden School in Massachusetts to St. Paul's School in New Hampshire.

It is noteworthy, however, that Kerry received a high honor at Yale despite his mediocre grades: He was chosen to deliver his senior class oration, a testament to his reputation as a public speaker. He delivered a speech questioning the wisdom of the Vietnam War, in which he would soon see combat.

Kerry gradually improved his grades, averaging 81 in his senior year. His highest single grade was an 89, for a political science class in his senior year. Despite his slow start, he went on to be a top student at Naval Candidate School, command a patrol boat in Vietnam, graduate from law school, and become a prosecutor, lieutenant governor, US senator, and presidential candidate.

In his Navy application, Kerry made clear that he spent much of his college time on extracurricular activities, including the Yale Political Union, the Debating Association, soccer, hockey, fencing, and membership in the elite Skull and Bones Society. Asked to describe non-school training that qualified him for the Navy, Kerry wrote: "A great deal of sailing - ocean and otherwise, including some navigation. Scuba diving. Rifle. Beginning of life saving." He said his special interests were "filming," writing, and politics, noting that the latter subject occupied 15 hours per week.

Gaddis Smith, a retired Yale history professor who taught both Kerry and Bush, said in a telephone interview that he vividly remembers Kerry as a student during the 1964-1965 school year, when Kerry would have been a sophomore. Smith said he doesn't have a specific memory about Bush.

Based on what Smith recalls teaching that year, Kerry scored a 71 and 79 in two of Smith's courses. When Smith was told those scores, he responded: "Uh, oh. I thought he was good student. Those aren't very good grades." To put the grades in perspective, Smith said that he had a well-earned reputation for being tough, and noted that such grades would probably be about 10 points higher in a similar class today because of the impact of what he called "grade inflation."

Bush went to Yale from 1964 to 1968; his highest grades were 88s in anthropology, history, and philosophy, according to the New Yorker article. He received one D in his four years, a 69 in astronomy. Yale and the White House have never confirmed the report, but Bush has said he was a C student.

Like Kerry, Bush reportedly suffered through a difficult freshman year and then pulled his grades up.

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:52 am
by dudelsack
They "disappeared" Bush's real report card, on which he was primarily a "D" and "F" student. Some friends of friends were working in Yale's registrar office one summer and the report was missing, later found filed under "Z." This was a few months before his grades were 'leaked' to the media (before the 2000 election), which are presumably what this story is referring to.
Anyway, the kids weren't supposed to be digging through the file, and they were threatened with expulsion and told to keep their mouths shut.

Anyway, it's nice to know that my horrible freshman year won't count against my political prospects in the future. Three cheers for alcohol!

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 12:36 pm
by Matt
dudelsack wrote:They "disappeared" Bush's real report card, on which he was primarily a "D" and "F" student. Some friends of friends were working in Yale's registrar office one summer and the report was missing, later found filed under "Z." This was a few months before his grades were 'leaked' to the media (before the 2000 election), which are presumably what this story is referring to.
Anyway, the kids weren't supposed to be digging through the file, and they were threatened with expulsion and told to keep their mouths shut.


That's interesting. Can you provide me with a web link regarding the above quote of yours?

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:05 pm
by dudelsack
No. Completely unsubstantiated rumor. Deal with it.

Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:26 pm
by Matt
dudelsack wrote:No. Completely unsubstantiated rumor. Deal with it.


I hadn't heard that before. I am so sorry for just asking a question.

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 5:35 pm
by krabapple
Of course, the news that these disclosed documents DO NOT support the Swift Boat smear campaigners' claims about Kerry , has been all but buried...instead, it's all about spinning the report cards instead -- kind of odd behavior for the supposedly liberal-biased media , don't you think, Matt?

From the Columbia Journalism Review Daily Report:

http://www.cjrdaily.org/archives/001578.asp


The Not-So-Swift Records for Truth

At the end of last August, CJR Daily first offered a verdict on the Kerry-in-Vietnam kerfuffle kept alive by the ironically named Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.

The culprit (not surprisingly): the press. The crime: a bias toward conflict, most especially manufactured conflict fabricated for headlines. At the time, we wrote, "With its natural bias toward ratings-generating conflict, the media readily embraced the SBVFT story, which, with its harsh allegations and clearly demarcated opposing sides, had about it the smell of blood in the water."

Yesterday, the Boston Globe reported that on May 20 Sen. Kerry finally signed Standard Form 180, authorizing release of his full military and medical records. As you may recall, during the presidential election campaign last year, SBVFT "demanded" that Kerry sign the form. The implication: Since he hadn't, he must be hiding some deep, dark secret. As it turns out, the Globe, which obtained the records from the Navy Personnel Command, found that the records were "mostly a duplication of what Kerry released during his 2004 campaign for president," providing no smoking gun, or whatever else the Swift Boat Vets were hoping for. The lack of damaging records quickly called into question Kerry's decision not to release the information during the campaign.

And, once again, the press managed to find a way to bend the story around conflict. First off, as Media Matters documented yesterday, the Boston Globe buried the piece about Kerry's 180 sign-off that vindicated his service record and discredited the dark suspicions of the SBVFT, running it on page 7. (Among other things, the Globe found that the records contained "numerous commendations from commanding officers who later criticized Kerry's Vietnam service.")

The Globe, however, thought something in the records deserved front-page coverage. That would be: "During last year's presidential campaign, John F. Kerry was the candidate often portrayed as intellectual and complex, while George W. Bush was the populist who mangled his sentences. But newly released records show that Bush and Kerry had a virtually identical grade average at Yale University four decades ago." (Italics Ours.) And, sure enough, all day yesterday the Web sites of CNN, Fox News, and other outlets fronted the story on Kerry's college grades. And the AP story, which many of the sites published, made no mention at all of the other information found -- or, more accurately not found -- in Kerry's records.

Meantime, John O'Neill, long-time Kerry nemesis and one of the architects of the SBFVT, told the Globe that his opinion of Kerry would remain the same -- notwithstanding all the disappointed conspiracists left holding the empty bag of Kerry's Form 180. For its part, the Los Angeles Times lent a megaphone to O'Neill to stoutly declare, "We asked [Kerry] to universally release his entire file, and what we've seen instead is a parceling out of incomplete records." In truth, by signing the Standard Form 180, Kerry followed through with precisely what O'Neill's group had been demanding since May 2004 -- something the Times did not clarify for its readers.

That's it. Game, set, match. Time for Mr. O'Neill to pack up his mud balls, slink off the rhetorical playground and find another venue.

Alas, if he does, a press addicted to conflict -- manufactured or otherwise -- will be there, eager to print whatever spin is thrown its way.

Count on it.

--Thomas Lang

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:12 pm
by Rspaight
Damn Kerry-loving, anti-Bush media.

Ryan

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:16 pm
by Matt
krabapple wrote:Of course, the news that these disclosed documents DO NOT support the Swift Boat smear campaigners' claims about Kerry , has been all but buried...instead, it's all about spinning the report cards instead -- kind of odd behavior for the supposedly liberal-biased media , don't you think, Matt?


That is out of character for the media. If it isn't a complete slam on Bush, why report it then? :wink:

Sarcasm aside, take a look at the last paragraph in the article below. No details on what combat ensued the night at all? Sounds strange. Well, no new ammo (justified or not) for the Swift Boat Vets.

Kerry allows Navy release of military, medical records
Show numerous commendations
By Michael Kranish, Globe Staff | June 7, 2005
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2005/06/07/kerry_allows_navy_release_of_military_medical_records/

WASHINGTON -- Senator John F. Kerry, ending at least two years of refusal, has waived privacy restrictions and authorized the release of his full military and medical records.

The records, which the Navy Personnel Command provided to the Globe, are mostly a duplication of what Kerry released during his 2004 campaign for president, including numerous commendations from commanding officers who later criticized Kerry's Vietnam service.

The lack of any substantive new material about Kerry's military career in the documents raises the question of why Kerry refused for so long to waive privacy restrictions. An earlier release of the full record might have helped his campaign because it contains a number of reports lauding his service. Indeed, one of the first actions of the group that came to be known as Swift Boat Veterans for Truth was to call on Kerry to sign a privacy waiver and release all of his military and medical records.

But Kerry refused, even though it turned out that the records included commendations from some of the same veterans who were criticizing him.

On May 20, Kerry signed a document called Standard Form 180, authorizing the Navy to send an ''undeleted" copy of his ''complete military service record and medical record" to the Globe. Asked why he delayed signing the form for so long, Kerry said in a written response: ''The call for me to sign a 180 form came from the same partisan operatives who were lying about my record on a daily basis on the Web and in the right-wing media. Even though the media was discrediting them, they continued to lie. I felt strongly that we shouldn't kowtow to them and their attempts to drag their lies out."

Many of the records contain praise for Kerry's service. For example, the documents quote Kerry's former commanding officers as saying he is ''one of the finest young officers with whom I have served;" is ''the acknowledged leader of his peer group;" and is ''highly recommended for promotion."

Kerry's refusal to waive privacy restrictions dates back to at least May 2003, when the Globe asked in writing for Kerry to sign the Form 180. As questions were raised about various actions in Vietnam, the Kerry campaign gradually released documents last year, but had not authorized the release of the entire file until now.

In April 2004, Kerry said he had already released his military records. ''I've shown them, they're available for you to come and look at," Kerry said in a television interview. But when a reporter showed up at campaign headquarters, he was told that no new records would be released. That prompted a flood of Republican criticism, and the campaign responded by gradually releasing more military records on its website. Kerry then released his ''fitness reports" -- evaluations by commanding officers -- on April 21, 2004.

Two days later, the campaign allowed some reporters to view Kerry's medical record but did not allow copies to be made and did not post that information online.

By signing Form 180 now, Kerry may hope to achieve several goals: settle the question of whether there is an explosive document in the file; put pressure on critics to release their military records; and try to put to rest an issue that dogged his 2004 campaign and would probably come up again if he seeks the presidency in 2008.

The file does not provide new documents about various combat actions. It contains mostly a repetition of Kerry's citations for the Silver Star, Bronze Star, and three Purple Hearts. For example, it does not include the combat ''after action reports" that detail what happened in some of the firefights in which Kerry participated. Those reports are available for public inspection at the Navy historical center in Washington and have already been widely disseminated.

John O'Neill, the leader of the Swift Boat veterans group and coauthor of the book ''Unfit for Command," said yesterday that he would be disappointed if Kerry's files do not contain new information. ''I would still have the same beliefs expressed in my book," he said.

O'Neill, who said he has already authorized the release of his records, has questioned a number of Kerry's combat actions involving the first Purple Heart, the Silver Star, and the Bronze Star.

For example, Kerry received his first Purple Heart for action on Dec. 2, 1968. Kerry told historian Douglas Brinkley that ''I never saw where the piece of shrapnel had come from." Kerry's critics have questioned whether the wound came from enemy fire, and his former commanding officer said the wound resembled a ''scratch." The file includes a previously reported reference to Kerry being treated for the wound and that he was awarded the Purple Heart, but it does not address the details of the combat that night. No after-action report for the incident has been found.