Rob P wrote:...if they really wanted to honor God's will, wouldn't they advocate taking her OFF the life support? Isn't making her remain on life support using the will of man to trump God's will?
In order to answer those questions, we must presume to know what God's will actually is. What if God doesn't want either one of those things? What if God didn't want her to get sick in the first place? If a drunk driver had killed her in a hit and run, would that have been God's will? If every action of man is (directly or indirectly) God's will, then removing the feeding tube would be God's will as well.
But without getting into a deep philosophical discussion, I think most people would agree that the ideal outcome would be a miraculous recovery. Some might say that we should keep her alive in order to hold the door open for such a miracle ("through God all things are possible"), but I believe that "To every thing there is a season...a time to be born, and a time to die."
What's really ridiculous, IMO, is calling the removal of the feeding tube "murder." Let's suppose that Terri ended up this way as a result of being shot. So the person that removes the feeding tube is the murderer...not the person who pulled the trigger? Or are they both "equally guilty" of murder?