Forums dot lukpac.org

For your convenience:

free and sovereign Iraq
liberty
growing
force
confident
strong
expansion
advances
security
parents' sacrifice
growing
tax relief to every person who pays income taxes
overcome a recession
opened up
corporate criminals
raised
highest level
the last year alone ... added ... jobs
restraining the spending appetite
spending discipline
growth
tax relief
cut the deficit
reduces or eliminates more than 150 government programs
stronger and more dynamic
rising
No Child Left Behind Act
higher
on the rise
gap
a ticket to success
strengthening
increasing the size
stronger and more competitive
punish
free
junk lawsuits
frivolous asbestos claims
stronger and more productive
buy insurance
expanded
liability reform
growing
more production
nuclear
Clear Skies
strong
expand
build
pro-growth
hardworking
chaos at our border
drug dealers
terrorists
moral
headed toward bankruptcy
strengthen
strong
serious problems
grow
By the year 2042, the entire system would be exhausted and bankrupt.
higher
massive new borrowing
severe cuts
once and for all
permanently
voluntary personal retirement accounts
grow
greater rate than anything the current system can deliver
government can never take it away
only go into a conservative mix of bonds and stock funds
can't be emptied out all at once
values
free
faith
moral
values
marriage
sacred
foundation of society
activist judges
children
constitutional amendment
culture of life
human embryos ... created for experimentation or grown for body parts
legislate from the bench
faith-based
gangs
gangs
gang life
Laura Bush
suffering
fear
prevention
crime
safe from danger
protected by peace
freedom
fear
September 11th, 2001
protect
defend our homeland
terrorism
terror cells
biological and chemical attack
border security
air marshals
make our homeland safer
the enemy
determined
al-Qaida terror network
attacked
terrorists
regimes
weapons of mass destruction
consequence
terrorists
kill
intimidate
fight
enemies
terror
war
tools
security
troops
Security
dangerous
nuclear
al-Qaida terrorists
dangers
radicalism
ideologies of murder
hatred
terror
terror will stalk America
free
force
rise
tyranny
terror
hatred
force
freedom
enemies
terrorist
war
evil
freedom
movements
ending tyranny in our world
United States has no right, no desire, and no intention to impose our form of government
enemies
impose
expand
empire of oppression
brutal
self-appointed rulers
control
build
free
freedom
momentum
violence
Secretary of State Rice
terror
terror
freedom
taking hold
regimes
terrorists
weapons of mass murder
Syria
terrorists
destroy
Syrian Accountability Act
terror
freedom
Iran
terror
nuclear
freedom
Iranian regime
uranium
plutonium
terror
liberty
freedom
front in the war on terror
terrorists
terrorists
freedom
war on terror
terrible threat
liberty
dangerous
insurgents
liberty
Saddam Hussein
Saddam
terrorists
insurgents
violently
attack
terrorists
destroyed
car bombers
assassins
fighting
destroy
free
extremists
freedom
security
security
security
liberty
firm
freedom
freedom
make America safer
embolden
terrorists
secure
freedom
attack on freedom
freedom
power
freedom
values
liberty
freedom
Franklin Roosevelt
freedom.
God bless America

Oh, and words that were *not* used:

gay
Osama bin Laden

Ryan

you forgot to add:

a ceaseless surfeit of spurious applause

True. Also, another word not used:

Mars

Ryan

From the ever-reliable Rude Pundit:

The State of the Union Is "Suck It, Fuckers":

Let's get one thing straight right here, right now, for every right-wing fuck doll in the media who gets up in arms about how "rude" the Democrats were for shouting "No" when Bush stood up last night and said, "Fuck your Social Security. I piss on your retirement": From the Buffalo News on Bill Clinton's 1995 State of the Union speech: "At one point, Republicans even booed. About 20 of them left before Clinton finished talking." What did the Republicans boo for? Because Clinton dared to say that there were some things that government must do.

Let's get another thing straight: the moment when Safia Taleb al-Suhail embraced Janet Norwood, whose son was killed in action in Iraq, resides in a stomach-churning netherworld between revolting and disturbing. It was revolting for its exploitation of the pain of this mother as a political prop for Bush's speech. Byron Norwood, a Marine Sergeant from good ol' Texas, was killed in the destruction of Fallujah. It was disturbing because the media's perception of the hug was such a product of desired delusion: please, please, please don't let this mother's son have died in vain, please don't let that man on the podium have sold us a bill of goods.

And the Rude Pundit is sick of hearing how "bold" is every fucking thing Bush proposes. If George Bush took a shit in front of the Lincoln Memorial, Orrin Hatch would appear on Fox "News" to declare how bold a shit it was and how mighty a loaf was pinched out and how are the Democrats going to deal with a President who is unafraid to take a dump with a stone Lincoln staring at him. It is not "bold" to target gays for isolation and denigration in the Constitution; it is not "bold" to cut domestic programs that mainly help those in poverty so that massive tax cuts can be made "permanent;" it is not "bold" to say that you want to create a Social Security system that no longer guarantees a retirement benefit for seniors and that cuts benefits to others; it is not "bold" to hinder scientific developments under the veil of "protecting life;" it is not "bold" to declare that that we should make sure that people on death row are actually guilty; it is not "bold" to imply that you will use military force to impose your political will on other nations. If this is what passes for "bold" in this America, then, indeed, cowards should hold their heads high and declare that their pusillanimity is actually "bold" retreat. Or maybe such "bold" people will just ink their fingers purple in solidarity with Iraqi "voters." Or the truly "bold" will dress in purple (like Condi).

But there he was, as ever, smirking, winking before talking about AIDS, looking around at every pause in the 88 applause interruptions (really, the most exercise Dennis Hastert gets all year), and telling all the nation, those who love and those who hate him, telling all the world, "Suck it, fuckers." And it didn't matter if Bush once again invoked weapons of mass destruction and state sponsors of terrorism despite the fact that the last time he did so he was lying. It didn't matter if he was lying about the "crisis" in Social Security. It didn't matter that he contradicted himself over and over within the speech, saying, for instance, "The United States has no right, no desire, and no intention to impose our form of government on anyone else" just before telling Saudi Arabia they better hop on the democracy bandwagon. It didn't matter if he portrayed Iraq and its people as grovellers at the feet of the mighty USA. Because he knows you better suck it, America, and don't neglect his balls while you're down there suckin'.

Bush ended "his" speech with a quote from Franklin Roosevelt's 1937 Inaugural Address, where Roosevelt included the famous words of poet Arthur O'Shaughnessy, "Each age is a dream that is dying, or one that is coming to birth." Of course, the Republicans are desperately trying to co-opt FDR to justify their destruction of his works. But one wonders if Bush has read the entirety of Roosevelt's Second Inaugural. See, because in the rest of it, Roosevelt said, "We of the Republic sensed the truth that democratic government has innate capacity to protect its people against disasters once considered inevitable, to solve problems once considered unsolvable. We would not admit that we could not find a way to master economic epidemics just as, after centuries of fatalistic suffering, we had found a way to master epidemics of disease. We refused to leave the problems of our common welfare to be solved by the winds of chance and the hurricanes of disaster." Huh. Just the thing that the Republicans booed when Clinton invoked such ideas in 1995.

In the rest of the speech, Roosevelt spoke about putting "private autocratic powers" in their place as "subordinate to the public government." And he spoke about the millions of people in desperate poverty and the soul of a nation that needs to help its own: "The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." Damn, how short a time is history when we look upon such notions as too radical to even be discussed.

By contrast, George W. Bush says, Yeah, lap it up, America. You are playing a sucker's game where the winners have already been promised the prizes.

Didn't watch the speech because there was an Andy Griffith show marathon on Nick at Nite and a guy must have priorities...

So I guess by siting Roosevelt at the end, Bush was saying that the dream of ending poverty in this country is dying?

Ryan, this could save you hours:

State of the Union Parsing Tool