Come Back Clinton Sex Nation

Expect plenty of disagreement. Just keep it civil.
mikenycLI
Posts: 526
Joined: Mon May 26, 2003 2:02 pm
Location: New York City Metropolitan Area, United States

Postby mikenycLI » Wed Jun 25, 2003 8:46 am

Bush is hoping to bide his time and as time goes by, we will ALL have short term memory. In addition, as Congress is complicit in this fraud, so they are not going to initiate ANY seriously, threatening inquiry.

Bush has already, successfully de-fanged, the 9-11 committee with the classified-national security shuffle, and total non-cooperation. It was kind of funny seeing the chairiman of that committee, sputtering in broad verbal strokes, on the Sunday news shows...because that's all he could legally do !

Nothing is going to happen, so it's a little silly getting all worked up about it.

Matt
Posts: 539
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 11:24 pm
What color are leaves?: Green
Spam?: No
Location: People's Republic of Maryland

Postby Matt » Wed Jun 25, 2003 11:58 am

lukpac wrote:Maybe it's just me, but I'd say getting people killed is a lot worse than "disrespecting the justice system".



Allright, I give. Getting people killed is worse than breaking the law.

User avatar
Grant
Posts: 486
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2003 1:53 pm
Location: Arizona

Postby Grant » Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:36 pm

lukpac wrote:
Matt wrote:No, it is not OK to lie. However, it is illegal to lie when you are under oath.


Well, what's worse: lying about a blow job (under oath!), or lying about weapons that don't exist, which directly puts US troops in danger?


If Monica gave me blowjobs, i'd lie about anything! :lol:

mikenycLI
Posts: 526
Joined: Mon May 26, 2003 2:02 pm
Location: New York City Metropolitan Area, United States

Postby mikenycLI » Tue Jul 01, 2003 2:58 am

Grant, with Monica, I think it's all a mirage. She doesn't give the impression, she could do ANYTHING, expertly, even something as simple as Sex.

In addition, as to Clinton's sexual preferences, I don't think his taste runs too good, anyway. To me, when he wants sex, frankly, the skankier, the better !

awestra
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 12:26 am
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby awestra » Wed Jul 02, 2003 3:03 pm

Clinton was a lawyer. He knows the law, and he lied under oath.


Refresh my memory again, when exactly did Clinton lie under oath?
Not all those who wander are lost. J.R.R Tolkien

mikenycLI
Posts: 526
Joined: Mon May 26, 2003 2:02 pm
Location: New York City Metropolitan Area, United States

Postby mikenycLI » Wed Jul 02, 2003 3:08 pm

What is the meaning of "when"...sorry I couldnt resist !

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Wed Jul 02, 2003 3:14 pm

If I recall correctly, in his sworn deposition in the Paula Jones harassment case, Clinton denied a sexual relationship with Lewinsky, which had various obstruction-of-justice implications in that case.

From the infamous Starr Report:

http://www.gooddocuments.com/icreport/grounds_m.htm

Ryan