Forums dot lukpac.org

A place to discuss music and Mallard Fillmore
It is currently Tue Feb 20, 2018 8:38 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Bob Dylan STREET-LEGAL
PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:24 pm
Posts: 946
Location: North America
I've been giving this another try - listening to the remix, I concede that some tracks are quite good, but at least three are God awful. "No Time To Think" is possibly the worst music of Dylan's career, at least in the bottom ten. "Baby Stop Crying" and "Is Your Love In Vain?" are terrible, and listening to these three in a row is the sonic equivalent of having three torpedoes blasted into a ship's hull. Even an interesting song like "Señor" or a pleasantry like "Where Are You Tonight?" or "We Better Talk This Over" can't keep this thing afloat after that.

Some people compare this to Blood on the Tracks because it was written when Dylan's divorce was going down while BOTT was written when his marriage to the same woman was on the rocks. Both albums were written in private at Dylan's home in Minnesota. When Dylan wrote BOTT, he was having a relationship of sorts with another woman, I think her name was Ellen Bernstein; four years later, a different woman accompanied Dylan when he was writing the songs that wound up on Street-Legal. Both women were his only companions during these private stretches in Minnesota, away from the music business. A lot of parallels there, but the disparity in quality is enormous, and the ratio of heartbreak and regret to bitterness and anger is pretty much reversed on Street-Legal. Instead of a man dealing with a crumbling marriage he wants to fix, we get songs from a man pissed off from his divorce with a whole lot of bitterness that, quite frankly, comes off as sexist on a few songs. That's really half the album, the other half isn't bad.

What about the sound? Well, I thought Hoffman's response to the remix was interesting. No, his preference for the original isn't surprising, but the points he made actually have plenty of weight.

Steve Hoffman wrote:
Listen to the first 10 seconds of the first song "Changing of the Guard." On the old CD using the old mix Dylan's vocal breathes and has dynamics. On the remix it's squashed and not loud enough in the mix, buried under the newly discovered and proud EQ'd to death instruments; a modern approach to mixing. I don't care what the drums sound like, I want Dylan to sound like Dylan and in the new mix he's almost an afterthought. That right there for me is a no-brainer; the original mix for all of the faults sounds better to me.

Do I like the sound of the old Dylan Street-Legal CD? No. It needs some good mastering. But, it's THE mix for me. If you want to help your old CD of Street-Legal along and you have a Parametric, try this:

+1@50, +1@6k, +1@10 or 12k. That should get it going for you.


I don't have the original mix on CD, but I had access to Greatest Hits Vol. 3, mastered by Vic Anesini, whch has "Changing of the Guards." I also have Biograph which was remastered by Greg Calbi in 1997 and includes "Señor." The remixing is more noticeable on "Changing of the Guards." I can hear what Hoffman's talking about, each instrument is a lot more noticeable and clearer, but each one also has more EQ, and the engineers/supervisor usually went for a pinched sound on the new mix. Dylan's voice is clearer but definitely less lifelike, there's more compression applied to it. I think he's wrong about Dylan's voice being mixed too low in the new mix, but the old mix definitely 'breathes' more and sounds less processed.

Having said that, the new mix is still preferable, IMO. The EQ is frustrating, it's pinched, but the old mix is just, I dunno, like a limp pile of spaghetti. Despite the 'audiophile' problems with the new mix, every instrument still manages to stand on its own, it actually seems like a sturdy mix. Unfortunately, some of the music just plain SUCKS, and I don't care what 'Dylanologists' say, it's NOT a case of bad recording. Some of those arrangements will always suck, no matter who's at the board, how tight the band's playing, or how free and relaxed Dylan may be to sing his best, the music on "No Time To Think" and several others sucks.

So here's "Changing of the Guards" in mp4 format for comparison. One is from the original mix, mastered by Anesini, the other is the new mix, mastered by Calbi for the new hybrid SACD.

The original crap mix:
hxxp://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?a ... 0217AD181C

The new pinched mix:
hxxp://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?a ... B773115D87

And if you want more, here's "Señor":

The original mix:
hxxp://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?a ... D43599555B

The new mix:
hxxp://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?a ... 7B2149279A

(Change "hxxp" to "http" if you want the links to work. Duh...)

_________________
"When people speak to you about a preventive war, you tell them to go and fight it. After my experience, I have come to hate war." – Dwight D. Eisenhower

"Neither slave nor tyrant." - Basque motto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 5:55 pm
Posts: 1226
Location: Out of my fucking mind
Now let's see if I'm following these audiophiliac convolutions correctly.
You're saying:

1. The music absolutely sucks

but

2. Let's ponder the relative sonic merits of two different mixes of the same unlistenable sucky music in order to decide which mix is "preferable"(!)

My question is:

WHY??

Now here's why I'm smarter than Hoffman. Try this volume setting for Street Legal:

0

Another old engineer's trick is switching the power button to the "off" position.

See? It works equally well with either mastering, as well as for the vinyl. And probably improves the rest of the Dylan catalog as well.

_________________
If you love Hi-REZ TAPE HISS, you're REALLY going to love Stereo Central


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 12:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:24 pm
Posts: 946
Location: North America
I said half the music sucks, the other half has merit. The two tracks I posted are actually decent songs, musically and lyrically.

_________________
"When people speak to you about a preventive war, you tell them to go and fight it. After my experience, I have come to hate war." – Dwight D. Eisenhower

"Neither slave nor tyrant." - Basque motto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 11:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 12:28 am
Posts: 421
Location: Blueberry Hill
Yeah, this one does have a few moments on it, and that is it. I keep trying to get into it and I will try again.

But one listen to Every Grain of Sand or Heart of Mine from Shot of Love, or anyhting from Infidels, and it is obviously the low point of the period. Oh, wait, not as low as Saved.

But anyway, BOTT has no connection to Street Legal, nothing no.

BOTT, Desire and Planet Waves are a trilogy of sorts. Nobody Cept You (Bootleg Series Box) is the track that links them together if you really wanted to know what I think. It has the acoustic guitar feel of BOTT, vocal recording process, deep regret and vocal delivery of Desire as found on Sara, electric guitar backing (R. Robertson) as found on Planet Waves

But Street Legal belongs mentioned in the same sentence as Self Portrait, Saved, Down in the Groove, etc. That kind of reckless tossed-out half-baked contractual obligation album. Pleeze.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group