Page 1 of 1
Harrison remasters....
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2004 10:21 pm
by Xenu
...anybody actually get these?;)
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2004 10:46 pm
by Xenu
"Live in Japan" is really confusing me so far. Anybody else get it?
I have a thread going in sh.tv, but discussion over here'd be nice as well.
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2004 11:10 pm
by Patrick M
Xenu wrote:I have a thread going in sh.tv, but discussion over here'd be nice as well.
I thought you were excommunicated.
Posted: Sun Feb 29, 2004 12:02 am
by lukpac
Xenu wrote:I have a thread going in sh.tv
The UD1 [sic] is better.
Posted: Sun Feb 29, 2004 12:57 am
by Patrick M
Bob Dylan taught George Harrison how to look haggard.
Posted: Sun Feb 29, 2004 11:05 am
by Rspaight
Your waveform images clearly show EQ tampering.
Ryan
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 4:23 pm
by Kjoerup
First I upsampled these Harrison CDs to 682734748383 kHz/5928282 bits.
My listening tests at 110 db detected subtle but definitely recognizable watery sounds at the 28kHz range, which can only mean NR artifacts, so I plan to toss all these reissues in a bonfire this evening.
If you can't hear at 28kHz then you need to upgrade your equipment to something comparable to my setup. (But don't even think about making it BETTER than mine!). It also helps to have $12,000 interconnects, but a Real Golden Ear like myself requires these things. Lesser mortals need not bother. In fact, you probably don't even deserve to be listening to music, period.
BTW, I'm writing this on all-tube computer and monitor. Euphonically coloured bytes have more air. I can see and hear the difference. This forum isn't so fatiguing on my PC setup.
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2004 6:11 pm
by Xenu
I'm glad everyone's being so helpful.
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2004 5:10 pm
by seth
I got them, and it's a nice package, but even as a hard core Beatles fan, I must say that George's solo stuff, with some notable exceptions, is, well, dull.
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2004 12:03 am
by Xenu
Yeah, I kind of agree. As much as I usually dislike Mr. Lynne's production, "Cloud 9" really spices up the formula by being something *different*. The songs are at different speeds! George sounds kind of into it! It isn't "Monty Python" music.
I do like many of George's albums, but I do think his lack of experimentation/variety hurts his solo career (whereas *too much* trend following sunk Macca in the eighties).