Bowie update

Just what the name says.
User avatar
Xenu
Sellout
Posts: 2209
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 8:15 pm

Bowie update

Postby Xenu » Tue Dec 16, 2003 12:41 am

I tested Space Oddity Ryko/Virgin, Hunky Dory Ryko/Virgin, and Ziggy Ryko/Virgin (Regular)/Ryko Gold. Findings:

a) Space Oddity seemed to be a different transfer.

b) As we've discovered, HD is the *same* digital transfer. That said, it's hilarious what dual-channeling Warhol did...the buzz on the low-frequency synth is almost completely obliterated on the Virgin!

c) All three Ziggy's are different transfers, although the two Ryko ones are *really* close (their waveforms look really similar, even magnified, but they do drift).
-------------
"Fuckin' Koreans" - Reno 911

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Tue Dec 16, 2003 9:19 am

Want a WAV sample (or more) from the CD layer of the Ziggy SACD? (I think it's pretty much the same thing as the 30th Ann CD.)

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

User avatar
Xenu
Sellout
Posts: 2209
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 8:15 pm

Postby Xenu » Tue Dec 16, 2003 1:06 pm

Ryan, is the SACD missing the two things absent on the 30th Anniversary CD?
-------------

"Fuckin' Koreans" - Reno 911

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Tue Dec 16, 2003 2:38 pm

You speak cryptically. I know not of these things which are missing, as I know nothing of the 30th Anniversary CD, except that people on SH.tv do not like it due to the fact that it makes their feet itchy and ears bloody.

What should I listen for?

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

Phil Elliott
Posts: 128
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 3:26 pm

Re: Bowie update

Postby Phil Elliott » Wed Dec 17, 2003 4:22 pm

Xenu wrote:
As we've discovered, HD is the *same* digital transfer. That said, it's hilarious what dual-channeling Warhol did...the buzz on the low-frequency synth is almost completely obliterated on the Virgin!


It's hilarious alright. You'd think the no-noise box would have a button on it that let them hear what was being thrown out? If they were listening at a comfortable volume, they would have spilt coffee all over themselves.
"If you knew what I was thinking you'd BE me."

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4592
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Re: Bowie update

Postby lukpac » Wed Dec 17, 2003 7:42 pm

Phil Elliott wrote:You'd think the no-noise box would have a button on it that let them hear what was being thrown out?


The funny thing is, most/all *do* have such an option.
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

User avatar
Xenu
Sellout
Posts: 2209
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 8:15 pm

Postby Xenu » Thu Dec 18, 2003 3:45 am

Rspaight wrote:You speak cryptically. I know not of these things which are missing, as I know nothing of the 30th Anniversary CD, except that people on SH.tv do not like it due to the fact that it makes their feet itchy and ears bloody.

What should I listen for?

Ryan


OK.

The 30th Anniversary edition of Ziggy Stardust has the following things wrong with it:

a) Channels reversed.

b) As Ziggy (the title song) ends, there's this nice little acoustic appegio that leads right into Suffragette City. It ain't theah no'mo.

c) Hang Onto Yourself normally starts off with a brief countoff by David (REALLY low in volume). It ain't theah no'mo.

These are problems.

BTW, it's worth mentioning that the regular issue Virgin sounds *startlingly* different from the two Rykos...I'm tempted to post an MP3 to show you what I mean.
-------------

"Fuckin' Koreans" - Reno 911

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Thu Dec 18, 2003 8:57 pm

a) Channels are correct on the SACD and CD layers. At least, they are the same as on my RCA Dynaflex reissue (!) and Ryko 20th anniversary thingie.

b) The Ziggy-Suffragette transition is the same on the CD, SACD, LP and Ryko CD.

c) Countoff present and accounted for.

I hear a pretty big difference between the SACD and Rykos as well, even in the brief comparison I just did. The vocal (and everything else, for that matter) on the Ryko sounds "pinched" compared to the SACD, and the Ryko is "cleaner," though not necessarily in a good way. (The reissue Dynaflex LP, of course, sounds like a load of dingo's kidneys.)

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

User avatar
krabapple
Posts: 1615
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 4:19 pm

Postby krabapple » Thu Dec 18, 2003 11:26 pm

Dang, I was going to report the good news about the Ziggy SACD; you beat me to it.

Anyway, I too can verify that the stereo tracks of the SACD (either layer) have none of the reported glitches of the 30th Anniversary issue.