Dylan
- Rspaight
- Posts: 4386
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
- Location: The Reality-Based Community
- Contact:
I'm still waiting on the box from Red Trumpet, which shipped Tuesday. If I'm real lucky, it'll be here today, but probably tomorrow or Saturday. I plan to immerse myself in Dylan over the weekend and report back.
In the meantime, they're getting rave reviews over at SH.tv, except for this bizarre thread:
http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/showt ... adid=21729
Again, the mere suggestion that something's been mastered "wrong" is enough to induce mass hysteria.
Ryan
In the meantime, they're getting rave reviews over at SH.tv, except for this bizarre thread:
http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/showt ... adid=21729
Again, the mere suggestion that something's been mastered "wrong" is enough to induce mass hysteria.
Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney
-
Mike Hunte
- Senior Troll
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 4:48 pm
- Location: Bed
Re: Dylan
lukpac wrote:Anyone get some/all of the SACDs yet?
This weekend I bought Bringing It All Back Home, Blonde on Blonde and Love and Theft. Blood on the Tracks is on its way via snail mail.
I haven't done any A/B comparisons yet with other versions (for the most part I lost interest some time ago in that kind of exercise); I've just listened to the SACD layers (stereo only, I'm not set up for multichannel) of each of the ones I have. On their own terms, I think they sound fantastic -- crystal-clear and very detailed. And, surprisingly, Love and Theft really packs a nice low-end punch I don't think I've heard before.
-- JP
- Rspaight
- Posts: 4386
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
- Location: The Reality-Based Community
- Contact:
Another interesting thread over on SH:
http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/showt ... adid=21838
What a relief to know that Steve's disc still beats the SACD, if you copy them both to CD-R first.
If my box ever arrives, I'll give 'em both a listen and report back.
Ryan
http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/showt ... adid=21838
What a relief to know that Steve's disc still beats the SACD, if you copy them both to CD-R first.
If my box ever arrives, I'll give 'em both a listen and report back.
Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney
- lukpac
- Top Dog and Sellout
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
I like the "SACD in general should be much better than CD due to the higher resolution" posts. Mind you, at the moment, the only SACDs I have are the Stones discs, but am I the only one that thinks that SACD isn't all *that* great? I've done a few comparisons, and I honestly don't think I could tell the difference between the CD and SACD layers on those discs.
I still think the mastering goes a lot farther than the format.
I still think the mastering goes a lot farther than the format.
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD
- Rspaight
- Posts: 4386
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
- Location: The Reality-Based Community
- Contact:
I think all other things being equal, SACD has the potential to sound better than CD, but I tend to agree with you -- the quality of the mastering has a greater effect on the end product than the resolution of the format.
I was less-than-impressed with the SACD layers of the Stones stuff as well, but I've heard other SACDs that were pretty amazing (Gaucho, Stardust, Ghost in the Machine to name a few).
Ryan
I was less-than-impressed with the SACD layers of the Stones stuff as well, but I've heard other SACDs that were pretty amazing (Gaucho, Stardust, Ghost in the Machine to name a few).
Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney