Interstellar Overdrive mono mix weirdness

Just what the name says.
Chris M
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2003 11:17 pm
Location: Baton Rouge, LA

Interstellar Overdrive mono mix weirdness

Postby Chris M » Fri Sep 09, 2005 1:12 am

Everyone's familiar with the wild stereo panning at the end of the stereo mix of Interstellar Overdrive right? The mono mix is obviously not a fold down as there are organ and guitar parts on the mono mix that aren't present on the stereo but....the swirling ending (not the whole track) on the mono mix sounds just like a fold down of the stereo mix:confus:. Anyone know what I'm talking about? Might that bit be an edit piece that never received a dedicated mono mix and was simply folded down and tacked on the end of the true mono mix? I really doubt Norman Smith and Peter Bown did that but I can't think of any other explanation

User avatar
JWB
Posts: 440
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 2:12 am

Postby JWB » Fri Sep 09, 2005 8:41 am

I think the main song is overdubbed live during mono mixing and the ending is edited on but lacking overdubs, which is why it sounds similar to the stereo mix. It doesn't seem like a fold-down to me.

It's also possible that the stereo mix of the end section is just the mono mix panned around and around.

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:05 am

It's also possible that the stereo mix of the end section is just the mono mix panned around and around.


That sounds likely. It seems that *everything* is getting panned, with no other "stereo" activity going on.

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

User avatar
JWB
Posts: 440
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 2:12 am

Postby JWB » Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:38 am

Rspaight wrote:
It's also possible that the stereo mix of the end section is just the mono mix panned around and around.


That sounds likely. It seems that *everything* is getting panned, with no other "stereo" activity going on.

Ryan


Yeah, come to think of it, it's also the only part of the song where it really sounds like two Pink Floyd's playing simultaneously, as the mono overdub has been described.

Chris M
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2003 11:17 pm
Location: Baton Rouge, LA

Postby Chris M » Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:50 am

JWB wrote:
It's also possible that the stereo mix of the end section is just the mono mix panned around and around.


Interesting, I hadn't considered that. I think you're right but unless I'm missing something that doesn't explain why the ending on the mono mix sounds so screwy with the levels going up and down..

Chris M
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2003 11:17 pm
Location: Baton Rouge, LA

Postby Chris M » Fri Sep 09, 2005 12:02 pm

JWB wrote:
Rspaight wrote:
It's also possible that the stereo mix of the end section is just the mono mix panned around and around.


That sounds likely. It seems that *everything* is getting panned, with no other "stereo" activity going on.

Ryan


Yeah, come to think of it, it's also the only part of the song where it really sounds like two Pink Floyd's playing simultaneously, as the mono overdub has been described.


That unique mono mix of Interstellar on the French Arnold Layne EP is the track before it received the overdub of the entire band playing. There's lots of drums and guitar parts mising on the underdub...

User avatar
JWB
Posts: 440
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 2:12 am

Postby JWB » Fri Sep 09, 2005 12:10 pm

Chris M wrote:
JWB wrote:
Rspaight wrote:
It's also possible that the stereo mix of the end section is just the mono mix panned around and around.


That sounds likely. It seems that *everything* is getting panned, with no other "stereo" activity going on.

Ryan


Yeah, come to think of it, it's also the only part of the song where it really sounds like two Pink Floyd's playing simultaneously, as the mono overdub has been described.


That unique mono mix of Interstellar on the French Arnold Layne EP is the track before it received the overdub of the entire band playing. There's lots of drums and guitar parts mising on the underdub...


I know. I meant it's the only spot where you can REALLY tell, because they're so out of sync.

Phil Elliott
Posts: 128
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 3:26 pm

Postby Phil Elliott » Fri Sep 09, 2005 12:27 pm

Chris M wrote:
JWB wrote:
It's also possible that the stereo mix of the end section is just the mono mix panned around and around.


Interesting, I hadn't considered that. I think you're right but unless I'm missing something that doesn't explain why the ending on the mono mix sounds so screwy with the levels going up and down..


Is it possible the "panning" section was a reduction to two tracks on the multis? That would explain what you are describing on the mono mix at a guess ...
"If you knew what I was thinking you'd BE me."