Elton John (Best CD's)

Just what the name says.
User avatar
krabapple
Posts: 1615
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 4:19 pm

Postby krabapple » Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:58 pm

You're a dick.


:D
"I recommend that you delete the Rancid Snakepit" - Grant

User avatar
krabapple
Posts: 1615
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 4:19 pm

Postby krabapple » Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:05 pm

So, regarding Elton John, I was perusing Bobby Owsinki's book on mastering, and saw an interview in there by the guy who did the surround EJ releases. He had some interesting things to say about Gus Dudgeon's remasters series...inforamtion more than opinion, mentioning that GD added reverb to some tracks in addition to changing EQ.
"I recommend that you delete the Rancid Snakepit" - Grant

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4591
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:47 pm

krabapple wrote:So, regarding Elton John, I was perusing Bobby Owsinki's book on mastering, and saw an interview in there by the guy who did the surround EJ releases. He had some interesting things to say about Gus Dudgeon's remasters series...inforamtion more than opinion, mentioning that GD added reverb to some tracks in addition to changing EQ.


Dennis Drake strikes again!
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

User avatar
krabapple
Posts: 1615
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 4:19 pm

Postby krabapple » Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:08 am

lukpac wrote:
krabapple wrote:So, regarding Elton John, I was perusing Bobby Owsinki's book on mastering, and saw an interview in there by the guy who did the surround EJ releases. He had some interesting things to say about Gus Dudgeon's remasters series...inforamtion more than opinion, mentioning that GD added reverb to some tracks in addition to changing EQ.


Dennis Drake strikes again!


NB. I made a mistake -- the Owsinski book was on mixing.
(He has two others, on recording and tracking, respectively)

The other comment by Greg Penny regarding the GD remasters that I remember (I really should just order the book, I'm going by what I read standing in the book store) was that Dudgeon saw his remastering as an opportunity to fix old mistakes.

I remember Dudgeon himself writing, either in ICE or in some liner notes, that the EJ masters had 'gone soft' (!?), necessitating some high-frequency help, but I don't recall anything about that in the interview with Penny.

So questions would be, how do the two-channel SACD versions compare to the GD reissues? Are they the same, or new remasters, and if the latter, from the original tapes, or from GD's digital transfers?

I seem to recall that the bonus track 'Philadelphia Freedom' on the GD reissue of Cpt. Fantastic was *WAY* louder than the one on various Billboard/Rhino comp CD...and that it was also WAY loud on the SACD.
"I recommend that you delete the Rancid Snakepit" - Grant

User avatar
stevef
Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Postby stevef » Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:36 am

krabapple wrote:NB. I made a mistake -- the Owsinski book was on mixing.
(He has two others, on recording and tracking, respectively)

The other comment by Greg Penny regarding the GD remasters that I remember (I really should just order the book, I'm going by what I read standing in the book store) was that Dudgeon saw his remastering as an opportunity to fix old mistakes.

I remember Dudgeon himself writing, either in ICE or in some liner notes, that the EJ masters had 'gone soft' (!?), necessitating some high-frequency help, but I don't recall anything about that in the interview with Penny.

So questions would be, how do the two-channel SACD versions compare to the GD reissues? Are they the same, or new remasters, and if the latter, from the original tapes, or from GD's digital transfers?



I haven't done a lot of critical listening to the SACDs comparing them with the Rocket remasters. I do not know if they are Dudgeon's current remasters or not... but for the most part, I like the SACDs.

"Dudgeon saw his remastering as an opportunity to fix old mistakes".
This is exactly what I read Dudgeon did on the Rockets... I'd especially point out the mess he made of 11/17/70 where he changed the mix, added reverb, and also resquenced the album totally different from the original album some 30+ years on... his results sound nothing lke the original LP version! I can't speak for all of the other Elton John albums he remastered, as I haven't bothered to pick them up after hearing his screwed-up 11/17/70, which was one of my favorite Elton John albums. But I find the SACDs and MoFis to be better representations of the albums as I remembered growing up and listening to.
I personally would rather hear the albums as they were originally presented.

Steve

User avatar
MK
Posts: 946
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:24 pm
Location: North America

Postby MK » Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:02 am

11/17/70 is a live album, correct? I feel like live albums are often more vulnerable to revisionist history. Expanded reissues or extra tracks to present a more 'complete' concert on CD is one thing, but I'm talking about the sound - everything from remixing to reverb. I dunno, it's like a producer will think twice about messing with a studio album because it was carefully recorded, edited, overdubbed, sequenced, and mixed over and over again, whereas a live album is 'just' a simple live recording and things like reverb are justified because, hey, it sounds more 'live' now and that's what we're going for! (Yeah, I know, even in their first official releases, most live recordings are edited and overdubbed after-the-fact, but still...)
"When people speak to you about a preventive war, you tell them to go and fight it. After my experience, I have come to hate war." – Dwight D. Eisenhower

"Neither slave nor tyrant." - Basque motto

User avatar
MK
Posts: 946
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:24 pm
Location: North America

Postby MK » Wed Sep 06, 2006 11:03 am

BTW, how does the To Be Continued... box set sound? I'm not big on Elton's albums outside of Goodbye Yellow Brick Road and Honky Chateau, but the compilations look nice.
"When people speak to you about a preventive war, you tell them to go and fight it. After my experience, I have come to hate war." – Dwight D. Eisenhower



"Neither slave nor tyrant." - Basque motto

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:56 pm

I've got the first issue of the TBC box, and it sounds kind of dull and uninteresting to me. Not exactly bad (and certainly not squashed, since it predated hypercompression), just unmemorable. Inoffensive, I guess you could say. I could throw up a quick MP3 sample if you like.

I don't know if the 1990 version is at all like the later reissue, though.

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

User avatar
stevef
Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Postby stevef » Wed Sep 06, 2006 2:36 pm

Rspaight wrote:I've got the first issue of the TBC box, and it sounds kind of dull and uninteresting to me. Not exactly bad (and certainly not squashed, since it predated hypercompression), just unmemorable. Inoffensive, I guess you could say. I could throw up a quick MP3 sample if you like.

I don't know if the 1990 version is at all like the later reissue, though.

Ryan



The reissue of the To Be Continued boxset is supposed to be exactly the same as the original issue.

Back briefly on the subject of 11/17/70...
Yes, it is a *live* album but one recorded in a small studio, originally performed for an FM broadcast. The original recording sounds very good; Dudgeon applied heavy use of reverb on the most recent Rocket remaster, and remixed the sound quite drastically from what I can tell. At times, Elton's piano is buried farther back in the mix than the bass and drums... nothing like the original. Dudgeon not only made changes to the album, he made major changes - this is not "tinkering"...he massacred the original recording, which is a real shame. All previous versions on MCA, DJM, or Polydor are the ones to acquire. The orignal track list (even if it is actually *wrong*) works better.

Steve

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4591
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Wed Sep 06, 2006 2:46 pm

stevef wrote:Back briefly on the subject of 11/17/70...
Yes, it is a *live* album but one recorded in a small studio, originally performed for an FM broadcast. The original recording sounds very good; Dudgeon applied heavy use of reverb on the most recent Rocket remaster, and remixed the sound quite drastically from what I can tell. At times, Elton's piano is buried farther back in the mix than the bass and drums... nothing like the original. Dudgeon not only made changes to the album, he made major changes - this is not "tinkering"...he massacred the original recording, which is a real shame. All previous versions on MCA, DJM, or Polydor are the ones to acquire. The orignal track list (even if it is actually *wrong*) works better.


Didn't the US and UK releases originally feature different mixes?

At the moment I can't remember which versions I have and haven't heard, but I do know that side 2 of the original US Uni pressing has a pretty strange mix. Side 1 sounds pretty good, but side 2 left something to be desired.
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

Phil Elliott
Posts: 128
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 3:26 pm

Postby Phil Elliott » Wed Sep 06, 2006 2:52 pm

Here's the interview with GD in Sound On Sound magazine. He mentions the Elton CDs in the boxout at the bottom of the page. His opinon of the original CD's was less than complimentery.

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jul01/a ... udgeon.asp
"If you knew what I was thinking you'd BE me."

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4591
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Wed Sep 06, 2006 2:59 pm

"At the point on the CD where they crossfaded trying to go from side one to side two, the whole thing goes completely out of phase, so the audience goes all strangled and horrible and it sounds like it's coming down a phone. The person who did this obviously couldn't give a tuppeny f**k."

Last I knew that was an issue with the mix itself...
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

User avatar
MK
Posts: 946
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:24 pm
Location: North America

Postby MK » Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:18 pm

Rspaight wrote:I've got the first issue of the TBC box, and it sounds kind of dull and uninteresting to me. Not exactly bad (and certainly not squashed, since it predated hypercompression), just unmemorable. Inoffensive, I guess you could say. I could throw up a quick MP3 sample if you like.

I don't know if the 1990 version is at all like the later reissue, though.

Ryan


No, that's okay. I don't feel compelled to hunt down old, OOP pressings of Elton John CD's, so I'll probably get the box set. I think MFSL and DCC probably cover most of the Elton John songs/albums I like to hear, and the box set would probably cover the rest.
"When people speak to you about a preventive war, you tell them to go and fight it. After my experience, I have come to hate war." – Dwight D. Eisenhower



"Neither slave nor tyrant." - Basque motto

User avatar
MK
Posts: 946
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:24 pm
Location: North America

Postby MK » Fri Sep 08, 2006 2:24 pm

If anyone cares, the MFSL Tumbleweed is on Pedro's. Same with MFSL's gold CD of Clapton's 461 Ocean Blvd.

BTW, what's going on with Pedro's? Is that kid still sending info to the authorities?
"When people speak to you about a preventive war, you tell them to go and fight it. After my experience, I have come to hate war." – Dwight D. Eisenhower



"Neither slave nor tyrant." - Basque motto

User avatar
Jeff T.
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 12:28 am
Location: Blueberry Hill

Postby Jeff T. » Sat Sep 09, 2006 1:00 am

That's what I have. All the Elton MFSL's, toss in a superior Sound of EJ, and 1/2 Speed Super-Disc of GBYBR, and original UK DJM Vinyl LPs of Madman and S/T, and I pretty much have enough. I just need some SACDs or the SS mixes is about it.

Oh, I have a Nautilus Greatest Hits test pressing for fun.

A friend gave me a copy of the remastered Capt. Fantastic CD, and it was impossible to sit through. It's like the Stones Undercover, or The Who's Face Dances, that album that signals the decline of a great artist. A decline that let's you know that while there may be great songs coming later, there will never be another Quadrophenia, Exile, or Don't Shoot Me.

Elton was quoted today in the newspaper as saying he knows his day in the sun is over so far as radio is concerned, and he and Bernie are fine with it. They can get on with writing good songs still.