Nirvana - In Utero MFSL 24k gold CD vs. regular CD?

Just what the name says.
User avatar
MK
Posts: 946
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:24 pm
Location: North America

Nirvana - In Utero MFSL 24k gold CD vs. regular CD?

Postby MK » Tue Feb 22, 2005 1:25 pm

Has anyone compared the MFSL gold CD with the regular CD? Is the MFSL/MOFI better?

I've got the MFSL Nevermind gold CD and it's kind of disappointing. A hair softer in volume, I think, but not more dynamic. I almost want to say it's just different but I feels a little thin, too.

User avatar
Beatlesfan03
Posts: 582
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 11:45 pm
Location: Another red state :(

Postby Beatlesfan03 » Tue Feb 22, 2005 1:54 pm

The MoFi gets decent reviews over at sh.tv. It also has the Albini versions of "Heart Shaped Box" and "All Apologies" which the regular CD does not.
Craig

User avatar
Xenu
Sellout
Posts: 2209
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 8:15 pm

Postby Xenu » Tue Feb 22, 2005 2:25 pm

Beatlesfan03, I don't think the MoFi has the Albini HSB and AA. Those tracks recently surfaced on a German vinyl release for the first official time.
-------------
"Fuckin' Koreans" - Reno 911

Ess Ay Cee Dee
Posts: 1458
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:35 pm
Contact:

Postby Ess Ay Cee Dee » Tue Feb 22, 2005 2:27 pm

nt
Last edited by Ess Ay Cee Dee on Sun May 01, 2005 11:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
MK
Posts: 946
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:24 pm
Location: North America

Postby MK » Tue Feb 22, 2005 2:28 pm

David's right, the Albini versions of those two songs turned up on the German vinyl (possibly by mistake) and nowhere else.

The MFSL gold seems to match the standard CD release in content. And Pennyroyal Tea is the Albini version, not the Litt mix like the Wal-Mart versions.

User avatar
Beatlesfan03
Posts: 582
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2003 11:45 pm
Location: Another red state :(

Postby Beatlesfan03 » Tue Feb 22, 2005 2:54 pm

Xenu wrote:Beatlesfan03, I don't think the MoFi has the Albini HSB and AA. Those tracks recently surfaced on a German vinyl release for the first official time.


David, thanks for the correction. Something must have got crossed in the wires as I got the German vinyl because I had read somewhere that it used the same tape as mofi. The mofi contends for ridiculous sums on eBay these days.
Craig

User avatar
Patrick M
Posts: 1714
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: LukPac Land

Postby Patrick M » Tue Feb 22, 2005 3:31 pm

Chuck thinks that I look to good to be a computer geek. I think that I know too much about interface design, css, xhtml, php, asp, perl, and ia (too name a few things) to not be one.

Ess Ay Cee Dee
Posts: 1458
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:35 pm
Contact:

Postby Ess Ay Cee Dee » Tue Feb 22, 2005 3:37 pm

nt
Last edited by Ess Ay Cee Dee on Sun May 01, 2005 11:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4592
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Tue Feb 22, 2005 3:58 pm

"Better Records, in our tireless efforts to bring you the most amazing records in the history of the world, has discovered that there is more than one European import pressing of this title. In fact, there are exactly two as far as we can tell. As you would expect, one of them sounds much better than the other. "
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Tue Feb 22, 2005 4:03 pm

In Tom's World, there's Orgasmically Great and Utter Shit, and nothing in between.

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

Dob
Posts: 903
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 2:14 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: Nirvana - In Utero MFSL 24k gold CD vs. regular CD?

Postby Dob » Tue Feb 22, 2005 9:22 pm

MK wrote:Has anyone compared the MFSL gold CD with the regular CD? Is the MFSL/MOFI better?

I think it's a tiny bit better, but certainly not worth big bucks. If the MFSL Nevermind didn't thrill you, this one won't either.
Dob
-------------------
"Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance" -- HL Mencken

User avatar
MK
Posts: 946
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 4:24 pm
Location: North America

Postby MK » Tue Feb 22, 2005 9:36 pm

I've got one more question about the MOFI vs. Geffen CD debate of In Utero:

The regular CD is pretty loud, but Albini produced it so it may be compression built into the mix.

Assuming the MOFI is a flat transfer or at unlikely to compress the music, does the MOFI gold CD sound LESS COMPRESSED (or even SOFTER) than the regular CD, or just different EQ?

Right now I'm contemplating of making my own "special edition" of In Utero: "In Utero" plus the Scott Litt mix of "Pennyroyal Tea," "I Hate Myself and Want To Die," "Sappy," "Gallons...," "MV," and "Marigold."

As for that Nevermind vinyl, all I've got is a shitty Pioneer turntable from 1986. I'll just stick with the cheap CD and pump the bass.

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4592
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Tue Feb 22, 2005 9:50 pm

MK wrote:As for that Nevermind vinyl, all I've got is a shitty Pioneer turntable from 1986.


Mine's a probably even shittier Nikko from 1985. I like the cartridge, though, and I think the results are pretty good...
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

User avatar
krabapple
Posts: 1615
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 4:19 pm

Postby krabapple » Tue Feb 22, 2005 10:57 pm

"Territorial Pissings"
standard CD
Mofi CD

Image


The vocal 'intro' at the beginning is quieter overall in the Mofi than the in the standard, but for the rest it's more the reverse, and the Mofi has more dynamic variety (more contrasty ups'n'downs'). You could see this easier if it wasn't a crummy jpeg. What's interesting is that it all evens out: it makes them both measure about the same *overall* using typical Cool Edit stats (see below) even though they will probably sound different in a DBT.

overall stats:


Code: Select all

                       standard             mofi
                      Left     Right    Left     Right
Min Sample Value:      -30354  -32022   -28906   -27816
Max Sample Value:       32021  32021     31974    29824
Peak Amplitude(dB):    -.18    -.19     -.21     -.82
Possibly Clipped:       0      0          0        0
DC Offset:             -0.238  -0.079    0.004   -0.001
Minimum RMS Power(dB): -55.78  -62.38   -79.87   -80.33
Maximum RMS Power(dB): -11.25  -11.09   -11.02   -11.07
Average RMS Power(dB): -16.26  -16.38   -16.09   -16.4
Total RMS Power(dB):   -15.85  -15.99   -15.56   -15.92

track lengths are the same


intro only:

Code: Select all

                    Left  Right   Left   Right
Min Sample Value:  -16817  -17063   -11482  -16006
Max Sample Value:   14440   18503   13203   14382
Peak Amplitude:    -5.77   -4.96    -7.9    -6.22 
Possibly Clipped:      0      0     0          0
DC Offset:         -0.133  -0.031    0.002  -0.005
Minimum RMS Power: -61.17  -70.27   -79.22  -80.09 
Maximum RMS Power: -16.51  -14.31   -18.03  -15.41 
Average RMS Power: -23.14  -22.1    -24.87  -23.68 
Total RMS Power:   -22.48  -21.36   -24.2   -22.88 
Actual Bit Depth:  16 Bits 16 Bits  16 Bits 16 Bits
"I recommend that you delete the Rancid Snakepit" - Grant