Oldies No Longer Quite So Golden

Just what the name says.
mikenycLI
Posts: 526
Joined: Mon May 26, 2003 2:02 pm
Location: New York City Metropolitan Area, United States

Oldies No Longer Quite So Golden

Postby mikenycLI » Fri Jun 06, 2003 3:13 am

Courtesy of LA Times.com....

June 6, 2003

Oldies No Longer Quite So Golden

Sales of older hits have dropped 11% this year, a troubling shift in an industry that had relied on the titles to offset weak new-music business.



By Jeff Leeds, Times Staff Writer


The economics of the record industry rest on the notion that fans still like that old-time rock 'n' roll. But hundreds of older albums that have been propping up a weak new-music business, including Bob Seger & the Silver Bullet Band's 8-year-old "Greatest Hits," are starting to look shaky.

Sales of "deep-catalog" albums — defined by the industry as products in release for more than three years — have dropped 11% this year, declining more than twice as much as sales of new releases, according to Nielsen SoundScan data.

The shift represents a potentially devastating turn in the record industry's two-year slump, during which reliable revenue from older hits has helped offset a plunge in sales of new titles. The roughly 177 million deep-catalog albums sold in the U.S. last year represented about 25% of the industry's domestic sales and generated more than $2 billion, label executives estimate.

With the drop-off in sales of older titles, labels are increasingly exposed to the risks of financing new acts. What's more, the catalog decline wreaks havoc on labels' bottom lines: The older titles provide huge profit margins because they cost virtually nothing to promote.

Some classic standbys have suffered. Although people still buy hundreds of thousands of copies a year, sales of Bob Marley and the Wailers' "Legend," from Vivendi Universal's Island Def Jam unit, have dropped by more than one-third in the last two years, for example. Metallica's classic "Metallica," on AOL Time Warner's Elektra label, suffered a similarly rapid decline in the same period, selling an estimated 362,000 copies last year. Seger's hits package, on EMI Group's Capitol label, which is selling about 500,000 copies a year, is also off its peak in past years.

Music executives blame the slowdown in younger-skewing classics — those purchased most often by people younger than 25 — on digital piracy. The decline in sales of older-skewing titles suggests that the industry may be losing its ability to reach mature consumers, in part because so many traditional record stores have closed.

Survey data released this week by market research firm NPD Music showed that overall music sales were declining fastest among people age 36 and older, with nearly half of them saying there was a dearth of interesting music available from any source. Recent studies suggest the percentage of older consumers downloading music for free has remained flat, as younger people have increased online copying.

Still, many executives say, the older titles' slide shows that the free file-sharing networks such as Kazaa and Gnutella are popular with older, mainstream music fans. A survey in December by market research firm Ipsos-Reid, for example, found that about 12% of consumers age 35 to 54 download music from the networks.

Music executives suspect those older users are copying classic material from acts of their own generations, while the younger pirates are discovering industry icons for the first time.

"Every four years, a new generation discovers Bob Marley or discovers 'Dark Side of the Moon,' " said Eric Garland, chief of research firm BigChampagne, which monitors downloading traffic. "Now you've got a generation, or maybe a second generation, who grew up with CD-Rs [recordable discs] but not CD purchases. That, I think, would put a serious wrench in the works."

Some of the biggest record corporations have only begun to get serious about pursuing pirates of older material. Although labels have been flooding online networks with bogus versions of new songs in an effort to frustrate would-be pirates, for instance, they hadn't "spoofed" their catalog songs until recently.

The thinking, according to one executive, was "start with the big ones," which at the time appeared to be new pop releases.

That may have left some classic and profitable recordings vulnerable. Data from BigChampagne show that during one recent week, the list of 20 artists whose songs were shared the most on the online networks included Marley, Frank Sinatra, Neil Diamond and the Beatles.

But the recent slide may owe less to downloading than to a consumer shift to Wal-Mart, Target and other mass merchants, which carry far fewer catalog titles than conventional record stores.

Big chains, on average, have 1,500 to 5,500 titles on their shelves, compared with 50,000 or more at a typical Tower Records, according to estimates from label officials and retailers.

Conventional retail chains Sam Goody, Wherehouse and Music Network collectively have shuttered hundreds of stores this year, saying they are unable to compete with mass merchants that heavily discount CDs to draw customers to electronics and other products.

"Why is this year different from other years? Tons of stores closed," said artist manager Cliff Burnstein, whose firm Q-Prime represents Metallica, which has had one of the top-selling catalogs in the industry. "The Wal-Mart section for music isn't getting any bigger. It makes me very nervous."

Several executives also say the decline shows that the compact disc format — which ushered in a long run of prosperity for the music industry as fans replaced their cassette collections — finally is running out of gas.

The best hope for recapturing momentum may be new, paid Internet services such as Apple Computer's iTunes music store. In theory, these will offer labels limitless "space" to vend their older wares.

Some lament that a sizable chunk of today's music is so disposable that it isn't creating a catalog at all.

"If you look at the catalog that has been driving the catalog chart for years, there's not a lot of it that's younger than 10 to 15 years old," said John Esposito, president of Warner Music's WEA division. "After a while, even those become tired. This is a vital issue for us to deal with, because it could change all the rules if we don't get our arms around it."


http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-c ... 7508.story?
coll=la-headlines-business


Personal Note...Guess this is why we see all of the re-re-re-releasing of solid, crowd pleasers from Jefferson Airplane, Beach Boys, Steely Dan, etc., and NOTHING really new out there, that HAS NOT been released before.


Mike

Ron
Posts: 489
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 4:11 am
Location: Far Away From All You Fellas

Re: Oldies No Longer Quite So Golden

Postby Ron » Fri Jun 06, 2003 8:55 am


Survey data released this week by market research firm NPD Music showed that overall music sales were declining fastest among people age 36 and older, with nearly half of them saying there was a dearth of interesting music available from any source. Recent studies suggest the percentage of older consumers downloading music for free has remained flat, as younger people have increased online copying.

Still, many executives say, the older titles' slide shows that the free file-sharing networks such as Kazaa and Gnutella are popular with older, mainstream music fans. A survey in December by market research firm Ipsos-Reid, for example, found that about 12% of consumers age 35 to 54 download music from the networks.



So which is it, a "dearth of interesting music" or file sharing? Both probably.

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Re: Oldies No Longer Quite So Golden

Postby Rspaight » Fri Jun 06, 2003 10:44 am

Ron wrote:So which is it, a "dearth of interesting music" or file sharing? Both probably.


Yep. I'd add Clear Channel to the list of suspects as well, for making radio so generic and uninteresting.

Ryan

Ron
Posts: 489
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 4:11 am
Location: Far Away From All You Fellas

Postby Ron » Fri Jun 06, 2003 4:37 pm

You know, Ryan, that never occurred to me even though it should have been obvious. As many rely on the media for their musical "input," should that media be dull and unimaginative I guess that translates to fewer listeners buying stuff at Tower or online.

What, if any, involvement does the recording industry have in the likes of Clear Channel? Any involvement at all would be tantamount to the industry shooting itself in the foot.
Dr. Ron :mrgreen:TM "Do it 'till you're sick of it. Do it 'till you can't do it no more." Jesse Winchester

User avatar
Xenu
Sellout
Posts: 2209
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 8:15 pm

Postby Xenu » Sat Jun 07, 2003 12:40 am

"Well, uh, we can't blame kids for the sudden drop in Bob Seger sales....BUT THEIR PARENTS. THEIR PARENTS HAVE LEARNED EVIL TOO!"

Jesus.
-------------
"Fuckin' Koreans" - Reno 911

User avatar
Patrick M
Posts: 1714
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: LukPac Land

Postby Patrick M » Sat Jun 07, 2003 3:50 pm

The reason is that kids today have no taste, and modern musical groups suck. No, we just don't have the huge talent today that we did 25 years ago...guys like Bob Seger, for example.









:roll:

Ron
Posts: 489
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 4:11 am
Location: Far Away From All You Fellas

Postby Ron » Sat Jun 07, 2003 7:08 pm

I think there are many groups today as talented as Bob Seger. Well, *some* anyways.
Dr. Ron :mrgreen:TM "Do it 'till you're sick of it. Do it 'till you can't do it no more." Jesse Winchester

User avatar
Patrick M
Posts: 1714
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: LukPac Land

Postby Patrick M » Sat Jun 07, 2003 7:14 pm

I think I was being sarcastic.

Ron
Posts: 489
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2003 4:11 am
Location: Far Away From All You Fellas

Postby Ron » Sat Jun 07, 2003 7:21 pm

Patrick, let's not do this again. Full aware that you were being sarcastic, I replied in kind.
Dr. Ron :mrgreen:TM "Do it 'till you're sick of it. Do it 'till you can't do it no more." Jesse Winchester

mikenycLI
Posts: 526
Joined: Mon May 26, 2003 2:02 pm
Location: New York City Metropolitan Area, United States

Postby mikenycLI » Sun Jun 08, 2003 3:31 am

With all of the music fans grousing about the new Metallica album, it seems to me that we are tooo "sophisticated" about what a music group releases, and what we want from them. The arguments for this release have to do with the drum sound. So what ?

Aren't we being a little too picky ? Can we afford to be too picky, and are we destroying our own music industry with our unfair carping about it ?

It's not like a music group sets out to makes bad music, on purpose, is it ????

Considering that everyone seems to be releasing, socalled, Bad Music, these days, the real problem is, seeming to be, really, with the audience. NOT the Music Artist.

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4591
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Sun Jun 08, 2003 8:44 am

I don't know about that, Mikey. If people aren't buying the new Metallica album, chances are it's *not* because of the drum sound. I have a feeling most people would say "what do you mean?"

Why is the industry in decline? I don't know. But I don't think it's because of people being "picky". If people don't like an album, they don't like it, period.

mikenycLI
Posts: 526
Joined: Mon May 26, 2003 2:02 pm
Location: New York City Metropolitan Area, United States

Postby mikenycLI » Sun Jun 08, 2003 8:46 am

Luke,

Could there be THAT much, bad music being made ????

Or is this just a generational thing, that we "old farts" just don't "get" ?



Mike

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4591
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Sun Jun 08, 2003 9:48 am

Perhaps that much "bad" music, along with that much "good" music that simply isn't being heard.

User avatar
Patrick M
Posts: 1714
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: LukPac Land

Postby Patrick M » Sun Jun 08, 2003 3:25 pm

Ron wrote:Patrick, let's not do this again. Full aware that you were being sarcastic, I replied in kind.


Ooops. Sorry.

User avatar
Ed Bishop
Posts: 159
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 9:14 am
Location: The New Lair

Postby Ed Bishop » Sun Jun 08, 2003 10:27 pm

Patrick M wrote:The reason is that kids today have no taste, and modern musical groups suck. No, we just don't have the huge talent today that we did 25 years ago...guys like Bob Seger, for example.
:roll:


We have them, but for the most part, they've been pushed to the margins, usually on small indie labels without much sales clout. There are so many I will probably never hear, for that reason.

As for veterans, for the high quality of Johnny Cash's American albums, the sales have always been, at best, modest. Even when an aging vet with a lot to offer comes up with a fine album, it's success if fleeting because even parents are no longer listening. But you're right, there are no new Segers or Springsteens. Pity.

ED 8)
When remixing vintage tapes, imagine you are back in the time those recordings were made, and mix accordingly. forget Today's Sound Sensibilities....