Dob wrote:Steve never said that the Pastmasters are objectively better than the 2001 remasters.
Well, he clearly prefers them.
No doubt about it. He said, everything else just gives him a headache.
My point is, Steve knows how to distinguish facts and personal opinions. Some people can't, and they understand Steve's opinions as facts, and this leads to nonsense.
He will never plainly say, remaster x is better than remaster y. He will say what the differences are (the "facts"), and why he prefers x (the "opinion").