Sterling Sound remastering US Beatles albums

Just what the name says.
User avatar
Xenu
Sellout
Posts: 2209
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 8:15 pm

Postby Xenu » Mon Nov 22, 2004 6:20 pm

Eenteresting.
-------------
"Fuckin' Koreans" - Reno 911

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4592
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Mon Nov 22, 2004 8:05 pm

That's it? "Eenteresting".

You all suck.
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

RDK
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2003 5:51 pm

Postby RDK » Mon Nov 22, 2004 9:05 pm

Man, I'll have to listen again at home (for whatever reason, I'm not able to hear the files at work). But on my computer speakers A sounded nothing like C, and C sounded covered in reverb. Weird... :?:
ray

Dob
Posts: 903
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 2:14 pm
Location: Detroit

Postby Dob » Mon Nov 22, 2004 9:18 pm

lukpac wrote:On my cheap speakers at home, C sounds good, and A and B sound a bit muddy, but under headphones and in the car, C just sounds way too EQ'd.

I listened to these through my hifi link and my headphones.

Of the three, I liked the tonality of A best. B has a dull, "closed-in" sound. C is better than B, but the sibilants (among other things) sound a little too hot.
I don't hear any more reverb on C than what's on the LP. And I certainly didn't remove any when I EQ'd it.

IMO, judicious EQ can bring out spatial cues that widen the soundstage, and I'm inclined to say that this is what I'm hearing when I listen to A (as opposed to a difference in reverb). There's no question that A (and C) sounds wider and more open than B. In fact, if forced to choose I'd say that A has a slightly better soundstage than C as well.

Hey Luke, if you ever get around to comparing my "Gimme Shelter" remaster to the SACD original, you'll hear exactly what I'm talking about. The "opening up" of the sound on my remaster is due totally to EQ.
Dob
-------------------
"Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance" -- HL Mencken

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Mon Nov 22, 2004 9:29 pm

I didn't notice a whole lot more reverb on C as opposed to A. I think the treble boost made it sound that way by bringing the vocal echoes out more.

Listening for soundstage on my crappy work speakers is a waste of time. It's more like a soundbox.

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4592
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Mon Nov 22, 2004 9:33 pm

RDK wrote:Man, I'll have to listen again at home (for whatever reason, I'm not able to hear the files at work). But on my computer speakers A sounded nothing like C, and C sounded covered in reverb. Weird... :?:


Just shows what a bit of EQ can do...
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

Andreas
Posts: 535
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 2:41 am

Postby Andreas » Tue Nov 23, 2004 2:29 am

Great job, Luke!

That was the first time I heard a Capitol version of a Beatles song. I think all three versions suck compared to the mono version. But that was not really the point.
(Luke's version A sounds the best, but very close to version B.)
Last edited by Andreas on Tue Nov 23, 2004 5:24 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Xenu
Sellout
Posts: 2209
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 8:15 pm

Postby Xenu » Tue Nov 23, 2004 4:24 am

lukpac wrote:That's it? "Eenteresting".

You all suck.


OK. "I'm happy that your re-eqed version of the Capitol boxed-set matches/bests a Holland LP rip."

In all seriousness, though, do post the EQ curve you used. I feel I might be needing this in the future.
-------------

"Fuckin' Koreans" - Reno 911

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4592
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Tue Nov 23, 2004 8:56 am

Damn, forgot yesterday.

Off the top of my head, I noticed the BFS tracks needed a bit different EQ compared to the AHDN tracks. That is, at least when compared to the vinyl I was using as a reference ('70s Parlophone of AHDN - I compared I'll Cry Instead).

It's amazing how wacky tonality can be. Depending on what mood I'm in and how I'm listening, that EQ can sound just right, still too bright, or too dull. Having a frame of reference is a big deal too. Good example - I had loved the sound of Can't Buy Me Love off of German vinyl. But after re-eqing the Something New tracks and putting them next to CBML, it sounds kind of bass shy in comparison.
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

User avatar
David
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 11:06 am
Location: Chicago/NW Indiana

Postby David » Sat Dec 04, 2004 6:21 am

Did you re-EQ all four CD's? The one song sounds great and I'd like to hear more. Especially Something New. I know what high regard you give the German one.

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4592
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Sat Dec 04, 2004 12:05 pm

I've done all the (true stereo) AHDN tracks so far. Haven't touched MTB yet, and have no interest in doing Second Album.
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:54 pm

Perusing SH.tv, I see a thread mentioning that the new Michael Jackson box has only shifted 14,000 units. The article quoted mentions that the Beatles Capitol box, released on the same day, had sold 56,000.

Wow. Only 56,000 in nearly a month? That's not much. LIBN sold 280,000 in its first *week*. 1, of course, blasted out almost 600,000 its first week. Even if you take into account the four-disc aspect, LIBN *still* outsold this thing's one-month sales in one week.

I guess the boomer market ain't all it's cracked up to be. Wonder if we'll get a volume 2?

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

User avatar
lukpac
Top Dog and Sellout
Posts: 4592
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Postby lukpac » Wed Dec 08, 2004 1:26 pm

http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/showp ... stcount=60

Michael wrote:...actually, I believe these are geared towards the first generation fan, after all, we were forced to hear only the AMERICAN LP's as children, imports were not available as parallel releases in 1964...so, our beloved memories, warts and all will drive the sales through the roof, I'm predicting Top 10, possibly NUMBER ONE!...


Reading the start of that thread makes my head hurt.

BTW, I just saw this:

Xenu Goodwin wrote:Remember too that "I Feel Fine" and "She's a Woman" are EMI's creations, for the most part. They were reverbed mixes specifically delivered for the US audience. Dexter likely had little to do with them.


Do we really know this? It's known that different mixes were sent to the US, but how do we know they were much/any difference from their UK counterparts? Did the mixes themselves show up on boot or something?

It is interesting that those are the only 2 "added echo" tracks on that LP, though.
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD

User avatar
Rspaight
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
Location: The Reality-Based Community
Contact:

Postby Rspaight » Wed Dec 08, 2004 1:34 pm

The box peaked at #35 on the Top 200 chart, apparently. It's not in the top 100 of this week's chart (which is all you can see free online).

Barely made Top 40.

Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney

Gee Oh Are Tea
Posts: 440
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 5:54 pm
Location: Fallujah, Ontario

Postby Gee Oh Are Tea » Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:23 pm

Luke, I've heard some of your EQ stuff before but I've got to ask a stupid question: what software are you using to EQ (Cool Edit / Adobe Audition?) and what settings (because the A sample sounds a lot better than the actual Capitol mix - even though I suppose the intent of this release is to provide it to American fans in all its original glory). I'd certainly like to hear some samples of the (real) stereo AHDN tracks (I'm Happy Just To Dance With You has a decent soundstage on the UK stereo versions I have).

Cliff