So I'm listening to the Who version of Empty Glass and I just noticed something interesting. Glyn Johns-recorded drums (at least in the case of the Who) always have everything in stereo - even though the snare is usually centered, for example, it's still being picked up by two microphones, so it isn't *dead* center (like a vocal would be).
Yet at a few spots in the song, some drums *are* dead center. Crap, it just got even more interesting...
At about 0:45 I've always noticed the drumming changed. The hi-hat suddenly changes from eigth notes to quarter notes. Some had previously attributed that to poor playing by Keith Moon. Yet at that very moment, the drum sound changes from (more or less) dead center mono to stereo. Seems like that's an overdub of some sort for the intro.
During the "I've had enough of the way things are being done" parts there are some drums dead center, although perhaps those are simply the bass drums, which probably *would* be dead center. Not sure on that, though.
Then, at 5:02, there's a snare dead center on two and four which seems to be there to beef things up. That *has* to be an overdub. Either Keith wasn't playing through some of those parts (live), or the tracks were mixed down.
I think I'd agree with Fang that Keith's drumming is better on there than most of the songs on the album proper.
Empty Glass - Who version
- lukpac
- Top Dog and Sellout
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
Empty Glass - Who version
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD
- lukpac
- Top Dog and Sellout
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
That's how the story goes, yes. Although 1) those spots are very clearly different from the basic drum track, overdub or live, and 2) the demo on the Music Must Change boot is totally different. That's not to say Pete didn't make more than one demo, but I guess I'm not totally certain that *was* originally a demo.
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD
Well, I wouldn't go as far as Fang...I think there's a lot of empty room in the arrangement that I would normally be expecting Keith to fill.
That said, spot-on observations regarding the drumming. I don't have the liner notes at hand...this is a vintage mix, right?
-D
That said, spot-on observations regarding the drumming. I don't have the liner notes at hand...this is a vintage mix, right?
-D
-------------
"Fuckin' Koreans" - Reno 911
"Fuckin' Koreans" - Reno 911
- lukpac
- Top Dog and Sellout
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
Xenu wrote:Well, I wouldn't go as far as Fang...I think there's a lot of empty room in the arrangement that I would normally be expecting Keith to fill.
I wouldn't disagree, but for a lot of the album he doesn't do much beyond tapping out on the hi-hat and snare.
That said, spot-on observations regarding the drumming. I don't have the liner notes at hand...this is a vintage mix, right?
This is what the notes say:
EMPTY GLASS 6'23
(Pete Townshend) © 1978 Towser Tunes, Inc. (adm. By Longitude Music, Co.) - BMI
Recorded at Ramport in April, 1978.
Originally titled 'Choirboy', this is a rough mix of a group version of a song that eventually became the title track on Pete's second solo album. It features John and Keith playing over one of Pete's demos. Note the acoustic guitar and Entwistle's rare bass harmonics in the introduction.
Previously unreleased.
(Thanks to Brian C for the transcription).
No mention about original vs. remix. Although if it was actually a demo it *should* have mention of Pete's studios, which it doesn't. Of course that could be because of the liner notes team...
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD
- lukpac
- Top Dog and Sellout
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
I guess I'd assume it's a remix, but I've never heard another copy of that take/version.
Great song, and great version. The only thing it's missing are the "doo-wop, do-wop" backing vocals.
Great song, and great version. The only thing it's missing are the "doo-wop, do-wop" backing vocals.
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD
- lukpac
- Top Dog and Sellout
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
lukpac wrote:Of course that could be because of the liner notes team...
LOVE IS COMING DOWN 4'05
(Pete Townshend) © 1978 Towser Tunes, Inc. (adm. By Longitude Music, Co.) - BMI
Recorded at Ramport Studios on October 18, 1977. Ted Astley's strings were added in December
LOVE IS COMING DOWN (WORK-IN-PROGRESS MIX) 4'06
(Pete Townshend) © 1978 Towser Tunes, Inc. (adm. By Longitude Music, Co.) - BMI
Recorded at Ramport in April 1978.
This version of the song features different piano and bass parts, and has only a guide vocal.
Previously unreleased.
Huh? The "work-in-progress" version was done several months *after* the master? Dito for the "lost verse mix" of WAY.
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD
- lukpac
- Top Dog and Sellout
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
Not that anyone cares, but there's a smattering of similar overdubs here and there on the album. New Song has some sections where there seems to be that same snare overdub, for example. Also some cymbal overdubs near the end of Had Enough.
I've just never heard of Keith doing overdubs to "fill in the gaps" before...
I've just never heard of Keith doing overdubs to "fill in the gaps" before...
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD
- Rspaight
- Posts: 4386
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 10:48 am
- Location: The Reality-Based Community
- Contact:
I've always assumed the drums tracks on that LP were Frankensteined together from whatever competent performances they were able to get out of Keith. I recall reading accounts of those sessions talking about how they were lucky to get Keith "on" for more than fifteen minutes at a time...
Ryan
Ryan
RQOTW: "I'll make sure that our future is defined not by the letters ACLU, but by the letters USA." -- Mitt Romney
- lukpac
- Top Dog and Sellout
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 11:51 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Contact:
Fun with OOPS
Those drum overdubs just vanish...
It sounds like the "live" drum track was faded out around 1:54, only to return at 2:00.
Those drum overdubs just vanish...
It sounds like the "live" drum track was faded out around 1:54, only to return at 2:00.
"I know because it is impossible for a tape to hold the compression levels of these treble boosted MFSL's like Something/Anything. The metal particulate on the tape would shatter and all you'd hear is distortion if even that." - VD