Search found 539 matches

by Matt
Thu Jun 26, 2003 4:46 pm
Forum: Politics
Topic: Hillary Clintons new book details her pain.
Replies: 21
Views: 9285

Personally, I wouldn't spend the money on it. I have read newpaper distillations of it. If you have read it, please share your thoughts on it, with us. Sorry, I have not read the book. While we are on that, I would rather light my eyebrows on fire and beat them out with oars than read Clintons book!
by Matt
Thu Jun 26, 2003 4:38 pm
Forum: Politics
Topic: Hillary Clintons new book details her pain.
Replies: 21
Views: 9285

mikenycLI wrote:I feel there are many "meanings" to this bit of news to most people, unless of course changing one's eye color, is a fairly common event in your life, and then it's no news at all.


Have you read the book yet?
by Matt
Wed Jun 25, 2003 11:58 am
Forum: Politics
Topic: Come Back Clinton Sex Nation
Replies: 21
Views: 8782

lukpac wrote:Maybe it's just me, but I'd say getting people killed is a lot worse than "disrespecting the justice system".



Allright, I give. Getting people killed is worse than breaking the law.
by Matt
Tue Jun 24, 2003 11:38 pm
Forum: Politics
Topic: Come Back Clinton Sex Nation
Replies: 21
Views: 8782

No, it is not OK to lie. However, it is illegal to lie when you are under oath. Well, what's worse: lying about a blow job (under oath!), or lying about weapons that don't exist, which directly puts US troops in danger? Luke, I think lying is lying and it is wrong either way. When all said and done...
by Matt
Tue Jun 24, 2003 9:38 pm
Forum: Politics
Topic: Come Back Clinton Sex Nation
Replies: 21
Views: 8782

lukpac wrote:
Matt wrote:How about the difference between misspeaking and purgery?


So it's ok if it's not under oath?


No, it is not OK to lie. However, it is illegal to lie when you are under oath.
by Matt
Tue Jun 24, 2003 3:29 pm
Forum: Politics
Topic: Come Back Clinton Sex Nation
Replies: 21
Views: 8782

Patrick M wrote:
lukpac wrote:I mean, HE LIED! DON'T YOU GET IT PEOPLE???


What's the difference between 'lying' and 'misspeaking'?


How about the difference between misspeaking and purgery?
by Matt
Tue Jun 24, 2003 3:26 pm
Forum: Politics
Topic: Gore Eyeing Liberal Cable Network, Magazine Says
Replies: 2
Views: 1764

On some reflection, it should be a little refreshing to get some kind of diversion from the Rush Limbaugh/FOX News/C(ommie)N(ews)N(etwork)/Dennis Miller. I have to admit, that I've been going to buzzflash.com to get the, socalled, Liberal News Network slant on things...just to mix things up, and ge...
by Matt
Sat Jun 14, 2003 11:40 pm
Forum: General Music Discussion
Topic: Audiofilesharing
Replies: 3
Views: 2110

Jason,

There are also lossless usenet newsgroups that have these types of discs posted occasionally.
by Matt
Sat Jun 14, 2003 11:37 pm
Forum: Politics
Topic: Two unrelated news items that seem to belong together
Replies: 5
Views: 2889

Re: Two unrelated news items that seem to belong together

I used to like him, but he's been veering sharply to the right over the past few years, finally bottoming out with his jingoistic cheerleading for the Iraq war and hearty embrace of the Bush presidency. Ryan He is still a funny guy in my opinion. They all don't have to be bleeding hearts to be funny.
by Matt
Mon Jun 09, 2003 8:43 pm
Forum: Politics
Topic: Hillary Clintons new book details her pain.
Replies: 21
Views: 9285

Hillary Clintons new book details her pain.

http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2003/06/04/hillary_book/ It must have been so hard for her, but love conquers all. Imagine her being so mad, hardly being able to breathe and gulping for air. I am sure he never lied to her before - no wonder she was so mad! Let us hope Bubba did not have to keep comp...
by Matt
Mon May 26, 2003 7:04 pm
Forum: Politics
Topic: No WMDs after all, no excuse for war
Replies: 17
Views: 8434

Grant wrote:Hmmmm, let's ask the Iraqis today...


With the exception of some Shiites, I bet most of them would say they are ALOT better off without Saddam.
by Matt
Fri May 16, 2003 7:28 am
Forum: Politics
Topic: No WMDs after all, no excuse for war
Replies: 17
Views: 8434

Matt, you've missed the point. The war was fought ostensibly because Saddam posed a threat to the United States. So far it would appear that this was a lie. That doesn't bother you? Aaah. Most voters probably feel the same as you anyway, so what's the point. All presidents lie, hey even Clinton did...
by Matt
Thu May 15, 2003 11:47 pm
Forum: Politics
Topic: No WMDs after all, no excuse for war
Replies: 17
Views: 8434

Maybe the weapons are hidden under these:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... May13.html

Wow, there really was no reason for a war. Not even a moral obligation. What a nice guy Saddam was! Gosh we were so mislead. :roll:
by Matt
Sun May 11, 2003 12:08 am
Forum: Politics
Topic: W AWOL from the TANG, but the military loves him. Hmmmm.
Replies: 64
Views: 32328

Re: W AWOL from the TANG, but the military loves him. Hmmmm

Grant wrote: By the same, many secretly admired and agreed with Clinton, but they could not express it for fear of angering their superiors.


For real? Are you talking higher military ranks? I thought just like Dubya, Slick Willy was generally considered an Idiot by most.